essmd
Phantom X
Optional Satellite Radio
BMW X6 $62k, satellite radio is part of the $1,550 premium package
Build Your Own BMW - BMW North America
Home - BMW North America
Air suspension with no ride adjustment
2017 Range Rover $85k has air suspension $85k, but from user manual, no ride adjustments (only height)
Land Rover Owner Information
From what I can tell, the ride adjustment is a factor of damper/shock settings, with nothing to do with air suspension (air suspension mainly is for height adjustment and replaces springs). The car needs to have electronic damper control for that, and this is independent of air suspension (you can have a car with ride settings using standard springs, for example Porsche's PASM, and vice versa like in this Range Rover).
Noise
Quick google found this spec:
2012 Model S P85 $107k
Sound level @ idle (dB) 35.4
@ Full throttle (dB) 64.2
@ 70 mph cruise (dB) 61.2
2012 Tesla Model S Road Test Specs | Edmunds
2013 BMW M5 $92k:
Sound level @ idle (dB) 49.0
@ Full throttle (dB) 82.1
@ 70 mph cruise (dB) 63.0
2013 BMW M5 Road Test Specs | Edmunds
Actually economy cars tend to be more fully loaded at the same price than a premium car. A 3 series at $35k is a stripped model, but a $35k Chevy is going to be loaded. The standard equipment levels are not necessarily the differentiator for a premium vehicle.
Well, you sure got me... but my points are still valid...
Actually the type of air shock selected by the auto manufacturer determines the ability to control the ride, I discussed this with a Tesla Service Tech, and he showed me different models from the same high-end shock vendor. He said the Tesla shocks are more expensive, but the other types do allow selectable rides and require additional mechanisms, so it's cheaper to have the type Tesla uses... so Tesla and Land Rover vs all others...Hmmmm, I miss the ability to select.
As far as noise, I am referring to the Model X, which has much more road and wind noise than the Models S. due to FWD gaskets and seals, plus the huge windshield.
Title needs to be amended to 200 miles round trip range.
You better have a well thought out plan and plenty of time on your hands if you taking the Bolt 200 miles away from home.
Can't just talk to the Bolt and go "navigate to super charger" and be good to go 30 minutes later to whatever you are going.
That is the one massive benefit of the Model 3 over the Bolt... the SC network. It's bad enough driving a Tesla on the road requires the increase of at least 10% or more additional travel time for charging, presuming you can go the most direct routes, but it's gotta be more than twice that for the Bolt...even the rare Chademo chargers are less than half or worse than a SC charging rate.