How do you account for falling new cases in Hubei in particular?
They reverted back to the old testing methodology, which is why the number of cases quit rising.
Kind of like the US not testing unless you had visited china or came in contract with a known infected person, then claiming they have no evidence of it spreading locally - duh. Of course you won't have evidence of that when you specifically omit testing for it.
Just like FL has zero cases... yeah, not really. But you'll never know.
The state gave regular public updates on Zika, a mosquito-borne virus that infected more than 100 Floridians three years ago.
There was no problem with public updates then. But we know precious little about the coronavirus in Florida.
Gov. Ron DeSantis casually dribbled out a little information two weeks ago during a press event at Omni Middle School in Boca Raton, where he was touting an expansion of speech and debate programs in schools.
“Everybody to this date that has been tested has come back negative,” he said.
We don’t know anything about these everybodies or where they lived. Or about the somebody who got tested last week at Memorial Regional Hospital in Hollywood, according to the Sun-Sentinel, but not confirmed by the state.
Why the secrecy? If a virus that began in China two months ago and has already spread to 28 countries, including the United States, don’t the people of Florida have a right to be kept in the loop?
The state law cited is a passage in the Florida Administrative Code that says “all information contained in laboratory reports, notifiable disease or condition case reports and in related epidemiological investigatory notes is confidential.”
But the passage goes on to note three exceptions for releasing otherwise confidential disease or condition case reports to the public.
The exceptions are:
(1) If the state’s health department determines public release of information is warranted “due to the highly infectious nature of the disease.”
(2) If the release of information would be useful to reduce “the potential for further outbreaks.”
(3) If the release helps to identify or locate people in contact with the cases.
If one of those conditions is true, it trumps the patient confidentiality requirement.
In the case of the coronavirus, it wouldn’t be a stretch to argue that there’s more than enough wiggle room in the law for the state health department to be transparent with the public.
Using “patient privacy” as an excuse to tamp down information on a virus well on its way to becoming a pandemic says more about tourism than public safety in Florida.
The lack of openness has become a trend in Florida, as more and more public records become private.