A lot of people are looking at Sweden to see what could be the outcome of less intervention. Some people(like Trump) want to use Sweden as a warning example to argue why strong interventions are better, some look at Sweden to show that less intervention is better. Whatever the outcome, at least it’s an interesting experiment that might be useful for policy decision for other countries.
Anyway, I was surprised today when the first report after the Easter holiday came in, +169 new deaths spread out over the last few days was a lot less than I expected. Number of new confirmed cases are down, number of new deaths averaged over the last few days seems to be going down, numbers of patients currently in ICU are down while number of available ICU beds are growing. Maybe numbers are lagging, we will see over the next week, but the health organisation are optimistic and think we are past the peak. From what I have seen of this virus, I think we should be careful to think that the worst is behind us, but for now it is looking cautiously optimistic.
Some people have been saying that Sweden is going for herd immunity. The Swedish health organization has never claimed this, what they are saying is that they are trying to keep numbers low, slow down the spread and flatten the curve. Imo they have been very unclear with what is their strategy, sometimes it sounds like herd immunity, but they are denying this. Their stated goal is to protect the old and vulnerable, which imo they have failed at. They also want to have a sustainable response that we can keep for a long period of time. Also they have tried to bring into equality into the equation, as an example not everyone can work from home, thus it was wrong of Spotify to tell their workers to work from home. They got a lot of angry comments for this statement, but if one reads their mission statement, equality seems about as important as saving lives.
FWIW my own hypothesis is that Sweden has a lot going for it that will be hard to replicate in other countries. We have clean air, a high number of people with the CCR5-delta 32 mutation, we are a very individualistic country, seldom live many generations in one household, a lot of people supplement with vitamin D, and
we have been practicing social distancing since before the virus. Maybe our CFR will be lower than in Wuhan, Milano, Madrid, NYC etc. Initial numbers seems to indicate that 10-20% of people in Stockholm could have had the virus already.
Tl;dr Sweden will be used as an example to argue for less intervention...