Daniel in SD
(supervised)
I'm confused. What unsustainable measures is the United States taking that Australia did not do?FWIW
Australia is explicity not pursuing a hammer strategy, their PM was making that clear 2nd April.
Point is, suppression requires duration not shock. Shock (hammer) without duration is just delaying the 'big one' or to be more precise, the more intense the hammer, the less sustainable it is, therefore a gentler but more sustainable supression is more effective than a hammer strategy. Of course Reff needs to sustain below 1.
Note particularly well, the prime minister states (at that point in time late march/ early april) that he seems to be only leader saying this requires a sustainable action, not short term fix.
Also note now, how other countries are coming around to view it that way.
Australia was able to suppress the virus because they are doing test and trace. We have way too many cases and not enough testing to do that yet. It may be that we're completely screwed.
If this isn't a hammer I don't know what is. I don't think there will even be a dance. I think Australia is going to achieve complete eradication.
Last edited: