This reminds me of something I read recently:
If you weren't so angry, maybe you could comprehend what I wrote and you quoted:
If I hadn't posted the video, then
@TEG would not have linked a purported debunking, which I will calmly read and consider before forming an opinion.
On the vaccination debate, I know enough to have the opinion that the angry irrationality is mostly on the pro-vax side, since the sneering I've seen falsely dismisses any criticism of any aspect of vaccination as anti-science, flat-Earther rejection of all vaccination. Your post sounds like that, so I won't try to debate questions such as why do newborn babies need six vaccinations before their immune systems are even capable of responding normally, and why did Congress set up a special vaccination court so pharmaceutical companies can't be sued in ordinary courts.
Call me wary of "unwarranted influence" (Eisenhower's words) of one of the most powerful industries in the world.
And you know this how, exactly?