I concur, I have never advocated "infinite distancing". But I disagree with you that there is not science behind this. If you are a fan of history (which many of us need to be better at because as a society we keep repeating past mistakes), there is very good, rock solid data to support social distancing. This data is old, and comes from the Spanish Influenza pandemic of 1918, but the age of that data makes it no less valid.
This is also not the first time social distancing has been used since 1918, but if you go by the mainstream media you would think we are flying blind here.
These are good summary articles that cover these topics.
Social Distancing Sign
https://www.nationalacademies.org/n...istancing-and-what-it-means-for-everyday-life
I also agree that different businesses should have different sets of rules and that the implementation of social distancing, at least in the USA, should have been much better thought out. There could have been a better balance of precautions without the same level of economic impact.
Yes, and consistent with the destructive polarization in our society, people are sucked falsely into the notion that governments are either being much too restricting, or they are abandoning safety recklessly. It's a false binary choice. Both of those are happening, often times in the same state, and right next door to each other even. For example, in Charlotte County Florida, tennis courts were locked for almost 2 months. That's freakin' ridiculous because tennis is not an intimate sport, at least if you're playing singles which is what I do. So I could not exercise in my normal and preferred fashion due to an arbitrary restriction that did not have a good epidemiologic/infectious disease rationale. I even called the County Parks and Rec department to complain, identifying myself as a healthcare professional, and explaining the dynamics of transmission, and got nowhere. The evidence is compelling that outdoor transmission is very low, and if you segregate balls or simply pick them up with your racket and foot, there's no danger of virus transmission. On the other hand, there were lots of places that were open for quite a while that were crowded, where people were not wearing masks, and we know that those indoor places with minimal ventilation were virtual petri dishes. So we actually have the worst of both worlds in this mess – excessive restrictions some of the time and lack of structure and healthy limits on risky behaviors in other contexts. The common denominator is ignorance, and perhaps a lack of respect for basic science. We seem to have no shortage of that.
Last edited: