CLK350
Member
If you had "read all those", you would not (I hope) be posting false information.
If you are deficient in vitamin C from severe infection, such as when your level goes to zero during viral-induced sepsis, you can not orally replenish your stores fast enough to survive. IV-C is required to prevent or reverse the cytokine storm that destroys the lungs in COVID-19.
Here are quotes from scientists rebutting a disinformation article on the Internet:
Margreet Vissers, Professor, Centre for Free Radical Research, University of Otago:
The story of vitamin C and infections, particularly viral infections, is a very hotly contested area, and unfortunately for many years lots of claims have been made both by proponents and skeptical medical doctors that are not founded in fact. Fortunately in the past few years much better scientific data is available and we should concentrate on this and review it carefully. The papers cited in the article are mostly quite old and are criticised for this reason (not always fair). Here’s what I think is pertinent to the coronavirus discussion:
Interestingly, a clinical trial for administration of vitamin C to patients with coronavirus has been registered in China. This will take the hype out of the discussions, hopefully.
- It is now well established that vitamin C is rapidly turned over in our bodies when we are sick, and that the normal daily intake of around 200 mg per day is nowhere near enough to keep up with demand. This is particularly the case for respiratory illness and sepsis. Also, the sicker you are, the more vitamin C is required to maintain your body’s supply. This amount was shown to be around 6 g per day for the severely ill[1].
- Some recent studies have indicated a remarkable survival advantage when critically ill patients are given vitamin C. These studies have generated a lot of interest and there are a number of clinical trials underway at the moment[2].
- We now know that vitamin C is necessary for dozens of critical body functions that require the body stores to be adequately maintained, and that we should maintain levels above 50 μM in plasma to achieve this.
However, prevention is quite a different matter than treatment. We really have no idea whether having more vitamin C will prevent anyone contracting the coronavirus. However, as it is a viral pneumonia, there is a distinct possibility that additional vitamin C may help with treatment. There are no studies with this virus that show this, but some benefit has been suggested with other severe respiratory illnesses. The clinical trial in China should address this issue.
Anitra Carr, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago:
People with severe respiratory infections, such as pneumonia, have depleted vitamin C status, partly due to the enhanced oxidative stress that occurs during the inflammatory process[3]. Administration of recommended dietary intakes (e.g. up to 200 mg/day) of vitamin C to these people is not sufficient to overcome the enhanced utilization of the vitamin[1]; they instead require intravenous administration of gram doses (i.e. 2,000 mg/day)[4].
One recent clinical study has indicated that intravenous vitamin C may be able to decrease mortality in patients with severe pneumonia[5], which is a major complication of COVID-19. Clinical trials are currently underway to assess the effects of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in patients with COVID-19, however, the results from these studies are not likely to be available until later in the year[6].
No, the Shanghai government has not recommended intravenous vitamin C as a treatment for COVID-19
The widespread refusal to take Vit C more seriously into consideration is not new, and one has to wonder why this is so. The introduction of aspirin to reduce cancer incidence was also hotly fought by the medical authorities* just like any alternative cure besides surgery for heart disease**, hopefully the same will happen for Vit C, without letting all vitamins becoming reclassified as drugs requiring a medical prescription***.
To go back to Vit C, a few doctors have already established a protocol using it that essentially works 100% of the time. To quote from an article in Medium
" ..the highly respected Dr. Joe Varon in Texas is using the protocol and to date, has saved dozens of lives — does not move them to publish. “Did you know that 100% of his patients in the ICU are leaving the hospital and returning home to their families? 100%! He’s had NO deaths. Not one.” Nothing. “And what about the fact that his patients are getting off the ventilator in 48 hours instead of 10–21 days?” Crickets. “And did you know that with this early intervention protocol, patients who would have otherwise progressed to a ventilator in Dr. Varon’s hospital are remaining on the floor without needing to be intubated?” .. "
Well, dear readers here on the Tesla forum - as you already know how difficult it has been to believe in truths that go against the status quo and the usual way of thinking - please do consider, especially IF YOU OR ONE of your friends gets C19 and needs medical care, consider ensuring that their treating physicians are given this proven treatment protocol from the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Working Group.
Regarding (*), (**) and (***), these are well known facts, I don't have time to dig out the proper references here, but FM me and I'll be happy to do so if anyone is interested.