Doggydogworld
Active Member
I'm confident they won't hold steady at 25 deaths/day for another 10 weeks. It'll probably rise a bit higher then decline.After looking at this and continuing to observe the steady case count, with no significant gov't countermeasures, I don't think there's much chance that ND and SD won't exceed 3k deaths per million now. They just need 2 more months of this death rate, and they'll be there, and there's no example that I'm aware of where the projected death curve would suggest a different outcome. And they're going to easily exceed NYC in terms of % of population infected, so not really any reason to think their deaths would be lower, in spite of treatment advances and small age differences.
Will likely be the worst in the US, with the notable exception of the Navajo Nation, which is at ~3600 deaths per million, and increasing steadily (a horrible outcome for them - probably 30-35% of the population has been infected).
Until a community gets their first big wave they think it won't happen to them. When it finally hits it dominates the local conversation and people change their behavior regardless of government action. Especially older/at-risk people. SD faces a tough seasonal headwind and they won't change behavior as much as NY did, so deaths won't drop to near-zero. But there's no real COVID fatigue there, and it's not that hard to hang on a couple months until vaccines arrive for the most at-risk. I'm pretty sure they'll exceed 2000/million, but 3000 is less likely. Cases/day peaked almost two weeks ago.
Where did you get the Navajo data?
It was the goal for smallpox and is still the goal for polio. Plus some others. SARS-COV-2 is probably too prevalent and contagious, though. It depends on factors we don't know, such as mutation rate and persistence of immunity.That's never been the threshold for ANYTHING. Not AIDS, not opioid deaths, not highway fatalities.