AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
Indoor dining can be done somewhat safely but indoor bars are a different story.
I can’t believe that you could think that any activity conducted indoors unmasked could be the least bit safe. I am not saying bars are better (they are worse, most likely!), but “somewhat safe” is not an accurate description of indoor dining. We know this, from multiple papers published, and contact tracing. The exact risk depends on local disease levels.
But, this is the problem we have. People do not understand the risk. Individual risk is relatively small (not so small these days) for a particular activity, but in aggregate, it is catastrophic, if the objective is to bring the case count to zero (which should be the goal!) - or even if the objective is to keep case numbers steady.
Who would have thought that taking off your mask as soon as you get to the table makes you no more safe than not wearing one at all?
Reopening the high risk venues was pure insanity and we’ve known that since April. I suppose the thinking was that we had to give people a break, so that they would have some fun before a tough for winter. And also it helped keep businesses solvent (since the feds were not helping out).
But it just resulted in complacency and bad habits, and increasing case numbers. Should have gone for zero cases as you said. It was always possible. We just had to make that the goal. Would have had to be a federal goal though. I don’t think California could have maintained zero cases in isolation - can’t control interstate travel adequately.
Last edited: