Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Cybertruck "Foundation series" is a fantastic exercise in economics! ... and PROFITable

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
The Cybertruck "Foundation series" is a fantastic exercise in economics! ... and very profitable for Tesla!
(background; I've taught university economics for 6+ yrs)

TL;DR: Tesla is figuring out the market for Cybertrucks. They are necessarily doing "price discovery" here, figuring out what the demand side of the market will bear. More importantly, and more profitably for Tesla, Inc. (and TSLA holders), they are executing a fascinating program of "price discrimination" where they maximize profit by pricing Cybertruck higher for those who are more willing to pay that higher price. They've not entered the market with a single price for a particular configuration of the vehicle; they are rather embarking on a very clever program to find the high-willingness-to-pay buyers, and collect an extraordinary price from that subset of all Cybertruck buyers, before they make vehicles available to the more general market, who simply want to purchase at the published prices of 30 November 2023.

——————————————————————————————

Tesla began a period of what economist's call "price discovery" on 30 November 2023, with the initial deliveries of the Cybertruck.
  • Tesla understands the supply side: they know their costs to mfg a Cybertruck now, and they know better than us how rapidly they might ascend the manufacturing S-curve.
  • But they do not (yet) know what the "willingness to pay" is on the demand side. And they could not: until they published prices on 30 Nov and begin to see how the mere "reservations" turn into confirmed orders, by buyers using the configurator to actually order a particular model and option set for the car, and contractually obligate themselves to pay a certain price.
Tesla did not allow any random bunch of reservations to be configured in those first couple of weeks. Only a very few people, selected by some means we don't have full information about, were able to receive a Cybertruck then. There is little market knowledge there for Tesla to learn from.
Now, two weeks on, Tesla has access to a couple weeks of data on new reservations (at $250 ea.) and on any cancellations, as some number of the legacy reservation holders (at $100 ea.) might have decided they can't afford the newly-released higher prices for Cybertruck, and chosen to get their reservation fee refunded.
This is something of new knowledge for them; but not much.

However, the really large advantage Tesla has—with a novel new truck, the relatively-hot Tesla EV brand, seemingly good performance in various truck metrics, etc.—is the HUMONGOUS database of people (1+ million?) with email addresses who have put a (small) amount down to reserve some nebulous future benefit: possibly obtain an earlier allocation of scarce Cybertrucks during the early months/years before Tesla manufacturing capacity can meet the real demand. Real demand will only be determined when buyers must put real skin in the game. How? By placing a strong contract to purchase a particularly-configured Cybertruck at a particular price for a Tesla-estimated delivery date, and then forfeit that money if they do not follow through and close the deal.

The Foundation-series order approach is a fantastically beneficial exercise to separate the potential buyers on that very large list who are willing to pay a (much) higher price for the Cybertruck Foundation series basket of goods—branding, elite labeling, early(er) access, Full Self-Driving, etc.—from those who have a lower "willingness to pay". This is the classic concept known as "price discrimination", taught in any university intro microeconomics course. The profit maximizing strategy is to "sell the same good to different consumers at different prices" dependent on their willingness to pay.

As your basic econ textbook will teach you, there are three conditions necessary for price discrimination to be successful for a company:
  1. Preventing demanders from exchanging amongst themselves. If others can straightforwardly buy and sell the product, then they will “arbitrage” the trades, and will collect the profit that would have otherwise gone to the company that supplied the product. Entrepreneurial economic actors are always alert for these sorts of opportunities, and if the "rules of the game" don't prevent them from doing so, then we can expect to see quite a lot of this behavior. Tesla has contractual rules to limit this behavior.
  2. Distinguishing among different demanders. The company can do this easily here via the Foundation series offering, by adding the +$20,000 fee to the published price, and simply observing the take rate as they gradually sort through Tesla's very large backlog of reservations, dribbling out configuration opportunities at a pace of their choice, and refining their own model of "price discovery" as they note the take rate of different groups of reservation holders over time.
  3. Controlling any resentment that might prompt potential buyers to take their business somewhere else. Most Tesla customers won't have a big issue here, since Tesla is claiming to throw in a number of extra benefits that (vs. the official published prices on the website) are "worth" much of the $20k increase in price (FSD at $15k, for example). Of course, the market price for FSD is much lower (can't resell it, low take rate, etc.) and the marginal cost of providing it to one more owner is nearly zero to Tesla.

Tesla can readily meet all three conditions here with early Cybertruck sales using the Foundation series program.

At the end of the day, my take on the this is that Tesla published a set of prices on delivery day. They were higher than Tesla had projected on unveiling day in 2019. The news cycle has now run its course, some reservation holders are mad, and whatever downside Tesla is gonna get from that is already known.

But Tesla has the incredible opportunity to maximize profit by, two weeks on, adding another $20,000 in price for anyone who actually wants to get a Cybertruck in the near-term. Then, gradually working through the huge reservations list, and only selling to those buyers willing to pay the extra $20k, at least during the early months of Cybertruck production.

Brilliant!
(if you are Tesla, Inc., or a TSLA stockholder)

Less satisfying if you are (now) one of the potential buyers who, unlike condition no. 3, you understand what is going on, and your "resentment" is rather less controlled.

That's my take. I don't mean to throw shade on Tesla here. I'm trying to merely explain descriptively what is going on, and for many who haven't thought about economics ever, or not since that one required course they took in university, provide some helpful understanding.

Happy to engage in any serious questions, or corrections, or confusion about my post.

Tesla_Cybertruck_outside_unveil.jpg

"Tesla Cybertruck outside unveil" by u/Kruzat is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Admin note: Image added Blog Feed thumbnail
 
Last edited:
From CT forum member pricedm:

Below is AWD Dual (not AWD Tri-Cyberbeast that also comes with up to $4K installation).
Code:
Tesla Foundation series includes:
$295 All-Weather interior liners
$115 Glass roof sunshade
$40 Center console tray
$45 Gear locker dividers
$40 Vault D-rings
$25 L-track hooks
$25 L-track bottle opener
$1,000 White decor (current Tesla upcharge from black to white interior)
$600 Powershare home charger
$230 Powershare mobile connector
$1,000 - $2,000 est. Powershare/Powerwall v3 gateway plus installation up to $4,000; installation bonus appers to be for Beast only, not dual motor
$3,000 20 inch Cyberwheels with 35 inch tires (based on Rivian upcharge and cost of one Cyberwheel spare $1,200)
$7,000 FSD if configured on order prior to configuration locked by Tesla. Milestone passed. [vs $12,000 Tesla is charging new buyers]
$1,000 Lifetime premium connectivity ($100 per year)
-------------------------------------------------------------
$14,415 - $15,500 estimated value


Another variation on that that uses $12K for FSD.

Here is a great breakdown of the AWD Dual and cost of the engraving ;)

Tesla Cybertruck Break down what you get with the Foundation AWD Dual and cost for the engraving uuO0Rlw

 
Before I go on my rant, I will first of say I am buying the Founder Series dual motor.

The way they did the Foundation Series screws people. You are only paying for 2024 access. Tesla could have been nicer and had the AWD be $79,990 and have all the base options. Then tack $20,000 on for accessories. Once they put on different wheels and change the color of the seats, then they screwed us out of the $7500 Tax Credit. If they only charged $20,000 for FSD and the accesories/installation for charging/backup, then we would get the credit.

Why does the CyberBeast get $4000 in installation and dual motor doesn't? We are both paying $20,000, but the CyberBeast gets more from the same exact package. We are both paying $20,000 for the same "Foundation Series" package, but it is different in what we receive.

If you don't buy now, you most likely won't get your truck until 2025 or 2026 if you don't buy this version of the CyberTruck. I really think that they are concentrating on getting trucks out to a few thousands people across the US by March with dual motor. After they do that, this will concentrate on finishing the CyberBeast for the remainder of 2024. I have a feeling that they have most of 2024 future inventory accounted for. If you didn't order by now, you are now waiting to 2025.
 
The Cybertruck "Foundation series" is a fantastic exercise in economics! ... and very profitable for Tesla!
(background; I've taught university economics for 6+ yrs)

TL;DR: Tesla is figuring out the market for Cybertrucks. They are necessarily doing "price discovery" here, figuring out what the demand side of the market will bear. More importantly, and more profitably for Tesla, Inc. (and TSLA holders), they are executing a fascinating program of "price discrimination" where they maximize profit by pricing Cybertruck higher for those who are more willing to pay that higher price. They've not entered the market with a single price for a particular configuration of the vehicle; they are rather embarking on a very clever program to find the high-willingness-to-pay buyers, and collect an extraordinary price from that subset of all Cybertruck buyers, before they make vehicles available to the more general market, who simply want to purchase at the published prices of 30 November 2023.

——————————————————————————————

Tesla began a period of what economist's call "price discovery" on 30 November 2023, with the initial deliveries of the Cybertruck.
  • Tesla understands the supply side: they know their costs to mfg a Cybertruck now, and they know better than us how rapidly they might ascend the manufacturing S-curve.
  • But they do not (yet) know what the "willingness to pay" is on the demand side. And they could not: until they published prices on 30 Nov and begin to see how the mere "reservations" turn into confirmed orders, by buyers using the configurator to actually order a particular model and option set for the car, and contractually obligate themselves to pay a certain price.
Tesla did not allow any random bunch of reservations to be configured in those first couple of weeks. Only a very few people, selected by some means we don't have full information about, were able to receive a Cybertruck then. There is little market knowledge there for Tesla to learn from.
Now, two weeks on, Tesla has access to a couple weeks of data on new reservations (at $250 ea.) and on any cancellations, as some number of the legacy reservation holders (at $100 ea.) might have decided they can't afford the newly-released higher prices for Cybertruck, and chosen to get their reservation fee refunded.
This is something of new knowledge for them; but not much.

However, the really large advantage Tesla has—with a novel new truck, the relatively-hot Tesla EV brand, seemingly good performance in various truck metrics, etc.—is the HUMONGOUS database of people (1+ million?) with email addresses who have put a (small) amount down to reserve some nebulous future benefit: possibly obtain an earlier allocation of scarce Cybertrucks during the early months/years before Tesla manufacturing capacity can meet the real demand. Real demand will only be determined when buyers must put real skin in the game. How? By placing a strong contract to purchase a particularly-configured Cybertruck at a particular price for a Tesla-estimated delivery date, and then forfeit that money if they do not follow through and close the deal.

The Foundation-series order approach is a fantastically beneficial exercise to separate the potential buyers on that very large list who are willing to pay a (much) higher price for the Cybertruck Foundation series basket of goods—branding, elite labeling, early(er) access, etc.—from those who have a lower "willingness to pay". This is the classic concept known as "price discrimination", taught in any university intro microeconomics course. The profit maximizing strategy is to "sell the same good to different consumers at different prices" dependent on their willingness to pay.

As your basic econ textbook will teach you, there are three conditions necessary for price discrimination to be successful for a company:
  1. Preventing demanders from exchanging amongst themselves. If others can straightforwardly buy and sell the product, then they will “arbitrage” the trades, and will collect the profit that would have otherwise gone to the company that supplied the product. Entrepreneurial economic actors are always alert for these sorts of opportunities, and if the "rules of the game" don't prevent them from doing so, then we can expect to see quite a lot of this behavior. Tesla has contractual rules to limit this behavior.
  2. Distinguishing among different demanders. The company can do this easily here via the Foundation series offering, by adding the +$20,000 fee to the published price, and simply observing the take rate as they gradually sort through Tesla's very large backlog of reservations, dribbling out configuration opportunities at a pace of their choice, and refining their own model of "price discovery" as they note the take rate of different groups of reservation holders over time.
  3. Controlling any resentment that might prompt potential buyers to take their business somewhere else. Most Tesla customers won't have a big issue here, since Tesla is claiming to throw in a number of extra benefits that (vs. the official published prices on the website) are "worth" much of the $20k increase in price (FSD at $15k, for example). Of course, the market price for FSD is much lower (can't resell it, low take rate, etc.) and the marginal cost of providing it to one more owner is nearly zero to Tesla.

Tesla can readily meet all three conditions here with early Cybertruck sales using the Foundation series program.

At the end of the day, my take on the this is that Tesla published a set of prices on delivery day. They were higher than Tesla had projected on unveiling day in 2019. The news cycle has now run its course, some reservation holders are mad, and whatever downside Tesla is gonna get from that is already known.

But Tesla has the incredible opportunity to maximize profit by, two weeks on, adding another $20,000 in price for anyone who actually wants to get a Cybertruck in the near-term. Then, gradually working through the huge reservations list, and only selling to those buyers willing to pay the extra $20k, at least during the early months of Cybertruck production.

Brilliant!
(if you are Tesla, Inc., or a TSLA stockholder)

Less satisfying if you are (now) one of the potential buyers who, unlike condition no. 3, you understand what is going on, and your "resentment" is rather less controlled.

That's my take. I don't mean to throw shade on Tesla here. I'm trying to merely explain descriptively what is going on, and for many who haven't thought about economics ever, or not since that one required course they took in university, provide some helpful understanding.

Happy to engage in any serious questions, or corrections, or confusion about my post.
Well done, well done. Yes, Tesla is milking and leveraging; early adopter, loyalist, fanboy and Elon/Tesla devotionalist FoMo hysteria to maximize profit during low production 2024 ramp up. Pretty obvious, for those not donning the rose colored glasses.
 
Dutch auction
Good one:
A Dutch auction is a type of auction where the price of an item starts high and gradually decreases until a buyer bids and the item is sold at that lower price. It's the opposite of a traditional auction where the price starts low and increases as bidders compete.
 
So what happens to the market when everyone who had to have one right now and the people who just want one gets their Truck.
You mean in three to five years from now? Prices will drop off course. You are giving Tesla way too much credit on ramping up production. This will be a long process and demand will outweigh supply, especially when people see them out on the road. 90% of people will hate this thing, but 10% of people will fall in love with this monstrosity.
 
So what happens to the market when everyone who had to have one right now and the people who just want one gets their Truck.
Many regular prospective customers will be alienated and go elsewhere.

Like most US companies, which are short-range focused ("Quarter to quarter" mentality), Telsa will reap a short term profit boost and will hope to find something else for the next period. The losers here are the "early adopters," save for the self gratification they may get from, "being first on the block," with a new Cybertruck. Why do I say, "losers"? Is it to be nasty, or is there something "real" behind that comment which "some" may refuse to acknowledge? You decide....

1. Paying a price premium up front; thereby experiencing a much steeper depreciation curve than later deliveries. I offer the recent "refreshed" MS/MX Plaid/LR as exhibit "A"
2. Early VINs will not have the improvements that later vins with have, making resale and depreciation even a tougher pill to swallow
3. Early adopters "may" experience idiots trying to test the trueness of Elon's bold comments and claims about Cybertruck "toughness". Do you want this kind of attention?
4. Insurance premiums and repair costs - will "likely" be high until insurers and body shops learn from experience what it will cost to repair these.
5. I could go on, but will stop here.

YOMV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fairchild
As your basic econ textbook will teach you, there are three conditions necessary for price discrimination to be successful for a company:
  1. Preventing demanders from exchanging amongst themselves. If others can straightforwardly buy and sell the product, then they will “arbitrage” the trades, and will collect the profit that would have otherwise gone to the company that supplied the product. Entrepreneurial economic actors are always alert for these sorts of opportunities, and if the "rules of the game" don't prevent them from doing so, then we can expect to see quite a lot of this behavior. Tesla has contractual rules to limit this behavior.
  2. Distinguishing among different demanders. The company can do this easily here via the Foundation series offering, by adding the +$20,000 fee to the published price, and simply observing the take rate as they gradually sort through Tesla's very large backlog of reservations, dribbling out configuration opportunities at a pace of their choice, and refining their own model of "price discovery" as they note the take rate of different groups of reservation holders over time.
  3. Controlling any resentment that might prompt potential buyers to take their business somewhere else. Most Tesla customers won't have a big issue here, since Tesla is claiming to throw in a number of extra benefits that (vs. the official published prices on the website) are "worth" much of the $20k increase in price (FSD at $15k, for example). Of course, the market price for FSD is much lower (can't resell it, low take rate, etc.) and the marginal cost of providing it to one more owner is nearly zero to Tesla.

A thorough understanding and utilization of the Coarse Theorem would you say, professor??!! :D


Brilliant!
(if you are Tesla, Inc., or a TSLA stockholder)
Indeed I am ;)

That's my take. I don't mean to throw shade on Tesla here. I'm trying to merely explain descriptively what is going on, and for many who haven't thought about economics ever, or not since that one required course they took in university, provide some helpful understanding.

Happy to engage in any serious questions, or corrections, or confusion about my post.

A wonderfully written Treatise and enjoyed the intellectual discussion professor. Thank you!

beewang
 
Great analysis. A lot of what Tesla does makes much more sense when you take off your consumer hat and put on your business hat and consider margin optimization and risk management.

The Cybertruck launch is similar to the supply/demand imbalances when new graphics cards are launched. It's common for the retail prices to be well below the price that demand could support at launch volumes.

I've often wondered why companies like Nvidia don't just crank up the prices a ton at launch like Tesla is doing here.
 
Has this been posted?

Yes. The general consensus is that it was an inept driver using all season tires, rather than snow tires which he should have had. Also the tow company listed a number of other vehicles they had helped out. All of which could be driven in that sort of terrain and ice. They also did not have great drivers I guess!
 
Hear me out. How does what Tesla is doing differ from dealers who for 3 years have been charging ADM’s on Corvette's due to high demand. And I’m just using the C8 example. There are many. At least Tesla is throwing something in.
Exactly! Every dealership does that when any new popular model gets released.
The difference is, traditional manufacturers have to set their MSRP, then stealerships can upcharge all they want, and the manufacturers don't see any of that profit.
Tesla just happens to cut out the middleman, and are able to use the profit for their other projects.
People who get mad at Tesla for their high margins know nothing about owning a business. They will defend other manufacturers and hate on the dealerships. But since Tesla doesn't have dealerships, their hate gets directed at Tesla. It's blindness to how business works.

The traditional automakers have long since made their bed with the stealerships, and have to lie in it. I'm sure they'd love to not have to use a dealership network. But those deals existed before the internet, and aren't able/willing to renegotiate them.
Even though, if they could work together with the UAW union, it would be beneficial in the long-term to go away from the dealership model. But a bit of chaos in the short-term. Oh well, it just lets Tesla continue to catch/pass them in market share.
Dinosaurs go extinct when they don't evolve.
 
In a way, this is only fair.
The earliest Cybertrucks will cost much more to build than they will cost later on. As production volume ramps to scale, individual costs will quickly come down.
The first Cybertruck have a higher sales price than they will have as Tesla learns how to produce them more efficiently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jebinc