You're missing his point. He was implying that Musk is the liar, not you. As in, either you or Musk is lying, and since presumably you're not lying, then it must be Musk who's lying.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Decreased Distance with 28.8
- Thread starter r1200gs4ok
- Start date
You're missing his point. He was implying that Musk is the liar, not you. As in, either you or Musk is lying, and since presumably you're not lying, then it must be Musk who's lying.
TomB985
Member
Sometimes this form makes me lose faith in humanity. We have some of the most persnickety vehicle owners in history present on this forum. I get it, these aren't cheap cars and he want everything to be perfect, but this is the real world and sometimes they aren't.
Getting jelly over somebody else receiving an update before you is just ridiculous IMHO. I'm still on the "obsolete" version with thousands of others; I'm sure it will come at some point.
Getting jelly over somebody else receiving an update before you is just ridiculous IMHO. I'm still on the "obsolete" version with thousands of others; I'm sure it will come at some point.
Fernand
Active Member
On the subject of the OP complaint, there's such a
thing as Conservation of Matter, at least on our day
to day scale, barring nookular reactions.
Whatever the software displays, the car components
aren't vaporizing. The wheels, the motor(s) and the
batteries aren't being beamed out to Mars. Y'all worried
people, just relax a bit. It's all still there. The charging
protocol and the displayed (estimated) miles will change
back and forth without anyone "lying".
thing as Conservation of Matter, at least on our day
to day scale, barring nookular reactions.
Whatever the software displays, the car components
aren't vaporizing. The wheels, the motor(s) and the
batteries aren't being beamed out to Mars. Y'all worried
people, just relax a bit. It's all still there. The charging
protocol and the displayed (estimated) miles will change
back and forth without anyone "lying".
Hyperbole much? It's not that someone else got the update before you, it's that the CEO of Tesla on multiple occasions has said FSD purchasers from back when would get in the Early Access Program, he even had a tweet responding to someone asking about it and he said he would take care of it. No car is perfect, but there are things Tesla can do AT NO COST to keep their customers happy and to uphold the promises they made.
As for the OP, well Tesla doesn't really share much about how much battery degradation you are getting, and sometimes what appears to be battery degradation is actually just the system not calibrated to your battery based on how you charge it, at least for the Model 3. There are different issues with older Model S/X cars that is a whole different other story.
Not sure if anyone responded to your post but the M3P + & - will turn on full regen.
insaneoctane
Well-Known Member
Starting around version 24 my range has had more variability and hysteresis than ever. After night time charges my next morning range fluctuates by more than 14 miles with the same settings. I lose about 10-15 miles of range while parked at work for 7 to 9 hours even though I don't use overheat protection or sentry AND my car is asleep the whole time. I hope Tesla settles down with the range permutations in the firmware soon. The only good news is that my 100% range is still pretty high 34K miles later. The bad news is that I can't really trust the range very closely because it's constantly changing for no apparent reason.
M109Rider
Active Member
Ya, we know. You’ve whined about this over and over again.
Take this to Tesla, and save us all the repetitive whining.
Seems you’re “misery likes company” focused, and that’s why you just keep going on and on.
Typical response on this forum, someone has an ongoing issue with Tesla and they're now a whiner, like Tesla can do no wrong.
Last edited:
M109Rider
Active Member
Nope. It’s not the ongoing issue, or that Tesla can do no wrong.
it’s the ongoing whining about the same thing over and over.
You made your point, it’s been discussed, why not take it up with Tesla, and move past it ?
My LR RWD charged to 308 when new (March 2018). Then when it was announced we'd get a bit of a boost, I never got around to charging it to 100% to see what my new max was. More recently (on 28.2) I charged to 100% since there was so much chatter about reduced range. I got 308.
So maybe I had more range at some point and then it got reduced. Or It's been 308 all this time. If my car is a little less prone to spontaneous combustion, I'll take it.
I had a 2000 BMW K1200LT .......was the best bike ever....I did everything to it at 60k....brake pads, rotors, tires, plugs, changed fork fluid, steel brake lines, transmission fluid, oil and filter, changed ABS module, new HID light, and abs sensor for the speedo...Great bike
I guess Elon was right, those of us who purchased FSD a long time ago get priority access. Looking at the remaining 37.8% of those on 2019.24.4, fully paid up for FSD, "all in" on Tesla, purchased the most expensive Tesla Model 3 you could possibly purchase (save white interior, yuck) and yet still on 2019.24.4. On good wi-fi, car rebooted, sitting parked and fully charged yet no update, nothing. Elon was right, we just have to imagine that we get what we paid for. Reality distortion field, indeed.
M109Rider
Active Member
Can Someone PLEASE give pscarroll a hug, and validate his concerns so this never ending rant can finally end.
Similar threads
