This thread, and many like it, always remind me of the 'Innovator's Dilemma, ' a book about the life cycle of new product release and the markets reaction to them. I will butcher this reference but if you are an 'Early Adopter' you welcome a new innovation for what amazing new functionality it brings even though it has shortcomings in other areas - some of which are done better by existing products.
The early Tesla buyers were definately part of this camp and would put up with a number of issues gladly for what they got from the Tesla in other areas.
When I see references to why can't Tesla be as good as GM or MB, these are not early or even late early adopters. They really are not comfortable relying on the amazing part of a product vs the places it comes up short.
Sorry for the ramble but as someone who is in his own, tiny, 1st world, delivery nightmare, I have often reminded myself that I want the S for a reason and, in my case, chose it over a Panamera even though a new car company may not deliver the same experience - at every level.
Early adopter - late majority: different expectations and triggers.
The early Tesla buyers were definately part of this camp and would put up with a number of issues gladly for what they got from the Tesla in other areas.
When I see references to why can't Tesla be as good as GM or MB, these are not early or even late early adopters. They really are not comfortable relying on the amazing part of a product vs the places it comes up short.
Sorry for the ramble but as someone who is in his own, tiny, 1st world, delivery nightmare, I have often reminded myself that I want the S for a reason and, in my case, chose it over a Panamera even though a new car company may not deliver the same experience - at every level.
Early adopter - late majority: different expectations and triggers.