It's also possible that Elon supported George W Bush at one point in his 04 campaign but had a change of heart before he stepped into the voting booth. I'm happy to give Elon the benefit of the doubt here. I don't think he was lying.
During a hostile take over, if you are not on board then you get the F out, public or private, It's a restructuring event, employees should understand what that means. If Elon was happy with what your company culture was before or what you were doing before, then he wouldn't have taken it over.
Sure we don't know what happened. So our bias will interpret this event in different way. Some will say he did it because he is a small vindictive narcissist who hate people who disagree with him. That's possible. So will say that he sees workers as vectors and he thinks companies work better when the workers' vectors point in the same direction. That's possible. Some will say that he fired them because they were not good enough. Etc etc. We don't know, but we should be honest that our own bias version of what happened will not convince anyone of a different bias. The only way to actually become better is to make predictions, see what happens and then backpropagate errors. So did Apple pull their ads from twitter? Did twitter crash? Are mDAUs down? Some people have some backpropagation to do or maybe their gradient descent function is not very good. As I will try to learn from me being overly optimistic about FSD timeline multiple times.
and yet I dont recall seeing an anti Tesla outside of these usual suspects. I have no doubt Reps use their tools to attack companies, too. They just dont target Tesla nearly as much.
They used to when it was more unclear if electric vehicles were the future or not. Then they stopped when democrats went crazy about Elon. Enemy's enemy became a friend.
nymag.com
Wikipedia: "Since 2015, a majority stake in Business Insider's parent company Insider Inc. has been owned by the German publishing house Axel Springer.". The NYT is a public company mostly owned by the Ochs Sulzberger family, I don't see any evidence that they're more one party or another. And of course one could counter with the list: Fox, WSJ, OAN, New York Post, Bloomberg, The Hill, Epoch Times ...
But alt-right bros DMing Elon directly to get progressives banned a-ok ?
I don't think he will touch that. He knows his new alt-right handlers support abolishing the constitution and making their over-lord president for lifeSo is Elon going to tweet his support for keeping the Constitution in place or does he think it might be a first amendment issue unless we suspend the entire thing?
And because kimdotcom is a co host…. I and many others could not see it because kimdotcom blocks those with pro Ukraine views. More of the fair and open town hall….Didn't the co-host, Kim Dotcom pay like $65k for a copy of Mein Kampf signed by Hitler? Sounds sus to me.
I see nothing!!
Kim Dotcom defends Nazi helmet photo
Kim Dotcom has officially launched his Internet Party, as more Nazi images have emerged.www.newshub.co.nz
Must be the virus he keeps talking about
I don’t know, $44,000,000,000 sure is a lot of rent for my neighborhood.
If you listen to what Elon said on Twitter space, all of this "Elon is doing this and that" are all in your head. He haven't even read much of the Twitter files but just got some snip bits of a summery. His time is limited to getting Twitter to profitability, adding features and figuring out ways to crush bots.
