I’ve tried for about 10 minutes to understand the point you are trying to make but am unable to do so. I’m not sure what you’re talking about honestly.
Does this look like what we are currently doing is improving race relations since 2015?
View attachment 912116
My point is that most Americans consider a person racist if they discriminate against people based on race. Anti racists think that a person is racist if they aren’t actively anti racist. The two views are incompatible and so people talk past each other because they don’t even agree on terminology.
My point, somewhat more simply is that the phrase:
Anti racists think that a person is racist if they aren’t actively anti racist.
Is wrong, its conservative spin.
What do I base that opinion on? I am as liberal as can be if you eliminate college students, professors, and anyone else who posts nonsense on the internet.
I live in a liberal area of a liberal state. All my close friends have professional degrees, all of them are liberal. Some have run for political office. My wife and I actually sit through ridiculous meetings of all of the candidates for LA county board of supervisors, including the no hopers who have no chance of winning. Volunteer for every Dem higher office campaign. Given money to who knows how many politicians who, after all, are nothing but politicians.
If anyone says, "aniti racists think that a person is racist if they arent' actively anti racist" and embedded in that sentence is the possibility in which "liberals" can be substituted for the term "anti-racists" -- its a BS conservative talking point.
The most advanced thinking on the liberal side of things today is not that the problem is there are too many individual racists. The problem is that certain structures produce racist outcomes. And those structures persist. No one I know even bothers, in a serious way, taking a tally of who might be "racist" and who isn't racist.
The most advanced thinking
is that it isn't helping racial equity at all, for me, personally, to be anti-racist in thought and deed. That only helps me, or the people I know. If all it took was for a majority of people to agree that racist actions are bad, we'd be done and dusted. But we are not. Its systemic. Its worse then "let's add up the admitted racists and the admitted non-racists and if we can get to 70% non racists its a win."
If conservatives were paying attention to actual liberals, they would have noted that the phrase "white privilege" is used in the context of white people trying to use their anti-racism as some sort of badge of honor. I shouldn't break my arm patting myself on the back that I voted for Obama twice, basically.
As for the poll, OK, I'm white, I don't really think that all of the African Americans I know or don't know really think about me one way or the other. Since I'm not a cop about to shoot their kid, they probably don't think about me at all.
For black people the poll is even more obvious, we went from an African American president to a guy as president who thought former confederate statutes are "fine." A black person might logically assume, without taking their own poll, that since 70 million people voted for this guy, that there are plenty out there who dont' like them.
The genius of conservative spin is to take the phrase "the U.S. has systemic racism in its society" and run with it, and say "liberals are calling you a racist."
Its absolute genius. They know that the average person, for sure, is not engaged in contemporary racial studies. They know the average person thinks mandatory work training is a waste of time and b.s. And they know the average person does not view themselves as members of a superior race.
The fact that that is not what liberals mean or think is no problemo. They know their intended audience.
I mean, this Dilbert guy actually thinks any bad outcome on his comic strip is because he is white? What is the level of THC in whatever he is smoking?