A journalist was working on this and probably gave Elon an expectation. Don't confuse "impossibly optimistic" with intentional lying.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A journalist was working on this and probably gave Elon an expectation. Don't confuse "impossibly optimistic" with intentional lying.
Watch the interview. The journalist changed his tune from " I've personally seen hate speech on the rise" to " I haven't looked at the feed for 6 months".The journo’s claim was accurate. The fact he didn’t have one of many potential examples at hand only means he wasn’t prepared. It doesn’t mean he was wrong, or, as Musk claimed, going even further, that he was lying.
Spot the smooth lie in this statement !!Earlier in the week Musk had, after getting through his previous top priorities of stripping The New York Times of its "verified" Twitter status
And you believe this because? Is there no circumstance where you won't give him a pass?A journalist was working on this and probably gave Elon an expectation. Don't confuse "impossibly optimistic" with intentional lying.
What is it when you keep making the same kind of mistake over and over again, and you are unable learn from it?Lying or just plain wrong?
- Funding secured
- Robo-taxis
- Vision cameras only
- Pedo
- Pelosi
- COVID going away in “April”
- Emerald mines
- Horse for flight attendant
- Yoel Roth sympathetic to pedophilia
- Taibbi employed at Substack
An Elon?What is it when you keep making the same kind of mistake over and over again, and you are unable learn from it?
You must be joking. He completely lied about the Elonjet "stalking" incident. It had nothing to do with his jet tracking and everything to do with an obsessed Grimes stalker.Elon doesn't lie
"impossibly optimistic"You must be joking. He completely lied about the Elonjet "stalking" incident. It had nothing to do with his jet tracking and everything to do with an obsessed Grimes stalker.
Which he did not know at that time, so his first suspicion was tracking somehow contributed to this incident.You must be joking. He completely lied about the Elonjet "stalking" incident. It had nothing to do with his jet tracking and everything to do with an obsessed Grimes stalker.
And once it turned out that way, Elon said something like Twitter files are behind us now.Did anyone else notice that the great "Twitter Files" kraken kinda turned into a nothing-burger, where what Elon released was mostly evidence that Twitter had attempted to use a fairly even hand with extremists of many kinds, had responded to requests from the government to take things down in a similar manner across both recent administrations, and now Elon is saying he wants to wrap it up having shown not-much, and prefers to change the topic to a vague claim that the government had "access to people's DM's" which I will bet money was only done under warrant.
The “no interventions” FSD video seemed to be intentional.Elon says things that are factual incorrect, but is he either doing that purposely or just being impulsive? Motivation is the measure of whether someone is lying or that they are just wrong.
He didn't know where Grimes lives, no where near where the plane landed? Sure.Which he did not know at that time, so his first suspicion was tracking somehow contributed to this incident.
Which he did not know at that time, so his first suspicion was tracking somehow contributed to this incident.
Nevertheless for someone who is in the cross-hairs of high and mighty, businessmen, politicians, and whole country and its armies and probably millions of extreme left loonies who would probably do a victory dance if he is eliminated, there is nothing wrong if he takes all the precautions to reduce the chance of a physical attack.
Sometimes the ultra rich forget.It turns out that jets are completely different from cars.
He takes things that aren't even remotely likely, and any intelligent person including him, knows it. Things he has no reason to believe. Then he chooses to say them anyway. That is intent.Elon says things that are factual incorrect, but is he either doing that purposely or just being impulsive? Motivation is the measure of whether someone is lying or that they are just wrong.
He takes things that aren't even remotely likely, and any intelligent person including him, knows it. Things he has no reason to believe. Then he chooses to say them anyway. That is intent.
"Twitter will be forming a content moderation council with widely diverse viewpoints. No major content decisions or account reinstatements will happen before that council convenes."Elon Musk in a Tweet
Which he did not know at that time