Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

EV6 to a Model Y

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Good afternoon, everyone.

I ended up trading Ruby the EV6 for a Model Y last night. My 5 months with the EV6 was fantastic, and the mechanical bits were every bit as awesome as I hoped going in. Ultimately, it was the lousy CCS charging experience combined with software that seemed like an afterthought that drove me to making the switch. For anyone interested, here are a few thoughts I have between the two.

IMG_8333.jpegIMG_7391.jpegIMG_8163.jpeg

Driving

The driving experience between the two is very different. The aggressive looks of the EV6 belie its fantastic road manners and refinement. I think my EV6 was the quietest and best-riding car I've ever had, and was MUCH better than the Model 3 that I had for two years previously. Everything was tight, there were no unusual noises, and it was a joy on the highway. In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Compared to the athletic EV6, I think the Model Y looks like a bloated fish. But the handling is the polar opposite with the aggressive steering ratio and smaller wheel. Despite its much larger size, the Model Y is 330 lbs lighter, and you can feel it. My AWD EV6 had the slick front axle disconnect that improved high-speed efficiency, but it came at the expense of a noticeable lag as the motor spun up deliver the power that my right foot was requesting. The Y is locked in at all times, and power comes on like a hammer. The standard Y calibration has a throttle tip-in that's somewhere between normal and Sport Mode on the EV6.

For overall performance, they're extremely close. I've seen drag races where the EV6 was right next to the Model Y up to about 60 MPH, and that's about my experience. The RWD EV6 isn't anything special for performance, but my AWD model felt like a rocketship. I think my '19 Standard Range 3 would walk it above 70 MPH though; the power dropoff at higher speeds was more pronounced. Below 60, it wasn't even close. Up until the Model Y, that EV6 was the fastest thing I've owned.

Interior and Storage

The Model Y really stands out for interior usability. It has a much larger cabin with over 75 cubic feet(2.12 cubic meters) compared to 52(1.47 cubic meters) for the EV6. The difference feels smaller because of how well laid out the EV6 is, but you can't beat the massive trunk well and frunk. Today was a good reminder of why I liked that frunk in the wintertime when I loaded almost half of a shopping cart's worth of cold groceries in the frunk to keep them chilled on the hour-long ride home. It's tough to beat that convenience.

The center console of the Y is closed off to deliver a cockpit-like feel, which isn't as usable as the big open tub underneath the rotary shifter in the EV6. The wireless charger is a better compared to the single unit under the driver's arm on the EV6. I never used it on my EV6 because of wired CarPlay, but that's a language that Tesla does not speak, so I'll be using it from now on. My Y came with the optional white interior, which looks great when it's clean. I'm concerned about keeping it that way, as I'm a bit neurotic about having a decent-looking car.

The EV6 is a lot more usable than the size difference would suggest. The overall passenger room seems about even between the two, but the rear passengers sit lower than the Y. The long cargo area is great. The first photo below is my EV6 swallowing 10 bags of topsoil with a rake and hose on top. My boys were comfortably in the back seat for the ride home, and there was no noticeable squatting with the added weight. I was impressed.

IMG_8498.jpegIMG_7341.jpegIMG_7339.jpegIMG_7195.jpeg

Infotainment/Navigation.

This is the one area that Tesla has the clear advantage. This shouldn't be news to anyone here. The physical controls of the EV6 great, but it didn't take long to get used to Tesla's system again despite the critical reviews. I hate the fact that Tesla does not support CarPlay, but Tesla's in-car system remains the best in the business despite some rearranging since I last left. The second-generation system in my Y with the Ryzen processor is noticeably snappier than the one in my last Tesla. And even the old Intel chip would leave Kia's UVO system in the dust.

I never had a problem with the speed of Kia's system, though, and I always enjoyed how many options we had within the various menus. But my early-build EV6 lacked preconditioning, and it's been made clear that this feature cannot be added within a simple OTA update. The EV6 doesn't have any kind of trip-planning function and doesn't give you a battery estimate of what will remain once you arrive. That's a major oversight for a company that's been making EVs for three years now, but I expect it will eventually be corrected with an OTA update at some point down the line. This shouldn't be a hard problem for Kia to solve.

IMG_7143.jpegIMG_7183.jpeg

To my ear, Tesla has a clear advantage with their sound system. I sat in the EV6 for the first time with high hopes for the 14-speaker Meridian system, but it was a big disappointment. It sounded better than most unbranded systems that I've had in the past, and better than the one in my Standard Range '19 Model 3, but that's as much as I'd give it. I believe this is a calibration issue more than a speaker quality one, so I hope there's some kind of improvement that gets released in the future. In comparison, the Model Y has deep, powerful bass and clear highs that are somewhat neutered when driven by Bluetooth audio. Seems to be better with direct streaming through Spotify, though. I switched to Apple Music when they came out with lossless a couple of years ago, so I hope to get the holiday update to compare the two soon.

Other stuff.

Tesla has long had the best mobile app in the business, and it's gotten even better since I sold my 3. The Kia app is functionally braindead in comparison. It's capable of remotely starting the HVAC, but you only have a limited degree of control. You can set the climate temp at the start, but you can't change it without stopping the system and adjusting the settings within the app. Once you send the command, you have to wait 5-20 seconds for the signal to be sent to the car and the app confirms the change. If you try and change anything before that, you get an "Error: Command in progress." For some silly reason, you can remotely enable the steering wheel heater with climate, but not the seats? It's really bizarre to slide into a warm cabin, grab a toasty wheel, and have a freezing ass.

Kia advertises their 800v system, and for very good reason. The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it. This thing would hold 220 kW from 10-60%, which made it charge the 77 kWh battery to 80% in about 20 minutes. I did this repeatedly on a road trip over the summer. Of course, this isn't possible in the winter with the lack of preconditioning, but later-build EV6es had that fixed. The Electrify America network is every bit the dumpster fire you've heard about, but when they work, it's fast. This won't last forever, though. I was also impressed with how strong the regen is on the EV6. It's noticeably stronger at all speeds to the Model Y despite the Y weighing 300 lbs less. You can do some neat things with 800v because you don't need as much current to do the same amount of work.

IMG_8524.JPEG

To conclude, my time spent with the EV6 was mostly filled with great thoughts. I really got to love the refinement and outstanding fast-charging capability. My previous experience was with a '19 Tesla Model 3 with a PTC heater that wasn't capable of achieving its 240-mile rated range in sunny weather rolling down a hill. The EV6 never disappointed me for range, and I was impressed with how well it manages energy. I certainly wouldn't rule out another Kia EV in the future, and Tesla needs to step up their game if they expect to retain their longstanding primacy in the EV market. An EV6 with a Tesla-like software experience would have the Model Y pretty well dialed in.

IMG_8498.jpeg
 
Last edited:
How’d you wind up in a Niro after an EV6??!

That’s like buying an OG S60 after returning a P85.
I had to stay in the dealer's good graces for the huge favor they extended. :)

I was too tall for the EV6 too (forgot to mention that) and the Niro worked for me on short notice. It wasn't difficult to turn the Niro for a profit after 3 months, and then the Model Y happened after a long summer's wait.

The Kias were really well built cars though. Felt no different than a Honda/Toyota. I wish I didn't have the "itch" and could just have a low-cost, reasonable car...
 
In comparison, the Y has a choppier ride, a bit more noise, and a strange booming resonance when I go over bumps at higher speed. It's not enough to be intrusive and much better than my '19 Model 3 was, but not to the level of the EV6.

Did someone say booming? You can help reduce that greatly by throwing in some vinyl tubing in the gasket, if you've already adjusted your hatch stops.

 
Did someone say booming? You can help reduce that greatly by throwing in some vinyl tubing in the gasket, if you've already adjusted your hatch stops.


Thank you! I'll give that a try.

The Kias were really well built cars though. Felt no different than a Honda/Toyota. I wish I didn't have the "itch" and could just have a low-cost, reasonable car...
Exactly this.

I'm normally a responsible guy, but I have a huge weakness for cars. My Model Y is my 23rd car over the last 20 years, and the EV6 had the best fit and finish out of anything else I've had. Their build quality was immaculate and wouldn't be out of place in a car costing twice as much. My Y is noticeably better than my '19 Model 3, but it's not to that level.
 
Keep in mind that there are several dimensions to EV efficiency. This test largely distills down to aerodynamic and contact rolling resistance efficiency. The Ioniq 5 and EV6 are not very aerodynamic, so I would expect the much slipperier MY to crush it there. The other efficiency areas are regen and battery management. And this does not show that. Kia/Hyundai is behind there too, but not as much.

Has Bjorn got his hands on a Lyriq or Taycan yet? Both of those are extremely aerodynamic, and I would expect them to do very well.
As far as battery management, Bjorn complained several times that the Ioniq5/EV6 had terrible battery management. He showed that it had problems keeping the cabin cool and the batteries cool at the same time. He had to turn off cabin AC to keep the batteries from thermal-throttling when fast charging. But even then, he showed that after fast charging, the batteries reached 50 degrees C, resulting in the motors thermal-throttling to 67kw max, resulting in no passing power, until the batteries cool. He also complained that the car kept scavenging heat from the batteries, even when navigating to a fast charger, which resulted in him arriving at the fast charger with the batteries around 0 degrees C. Altho I know recently they redid the firmware to actually warm the batteries when navigating to a fast charger, at least with the new models.

As far as the Taycan, he only got the cross tourismo version for the 1000km challenge. But he did the e-tron GT for the 1000km challenge, which is in the charts that I posted earlier.
 
Keep in mind that there are several dimensions to EV efficiency. This test largely distills down to aerodynamic and contact rolling resistance efficiency. The Ioniq 5 and EV6 are not very aerodynamic, so I would expect the much slipperier MY to crush it there. The other efficiency areas are regen and battery management. And this does not show that. Kia/Hyundai is behind there too, but not as much.

Has Bjorn got his hands on a Lyriq or Taycan yet? Both of those are extremely aerodynamic, and I would expect them to do very well.
The results were more from the battery management and other hardware and software that Kia and others are still catching up (long way).
 
The results were more from the battery management and other hardware and software that Kia and others are still catching up (long way).
Nope. It is really just a battery size / (CRR + Cd) test. That’s all it is.

I’m not arguing that the Tesla isn’t superior everywhere. It is. But steady highway is just an aerodynamics versus battery size contest. At highway speeds, air resistance force is the only thing the car has to overcome. The rest falls away.
 
Nope. It is really just a battery size / (CRR + Cd) test. That’s all it is.

I’m not arguing that the Tesla isn’t superior everywhere. It is. But steady highway is just an aerodynamics versus battery size contest. At highway speeds, air resistance force is the only thing the car has to overcome. The rest falls away.
I think he meant battery management in that charging plays a big role in these distances. For example, Bjorn did a race to the Arctic circle and back with a model 3 SR+, Taycan, and Mustang Mach-E. Tesla had the smallest battery and range, and Taycan the biggest. But the Tesla and Mach-E both beat the Taycan by over an hour. Bjorn said the Taycan kept cold-gating making it charge much slower than expected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nate704
I think he meant battery management in that charging plays a big role in these distances. For example, Bjorn did a race to the Arctic circle and back with a model 3 SR+, Taycan, and Mustang Mach-E. Tesla had the smallest battery and range, and Taycan the biggest. But the Tesla and Mach-E both beat the Taycan by over an hour. Bjorn said the Taycan kept cold-gating making it charge much slower than expected.
Yes, this I agree with too. Charging efficiency is another key dimension to EV performance.
 
I monitored the battery data with an OBD interface during most of my fast charging sessions with the EV6, and it was pretty interesting. Almost bipolar.

The system uses an 800v architecture, but it can take 400v from a CCS charger and use the power electronics in the rear motor and inverter to step it up to pack voltage. The differences were pretty dramatic. I could suck 220 kW from a deep discharge and the car pretty much sat there with the coolant pump humming. But once SOC rose above ~60% and the charge throttled down to 160 kW, the incoming voltage stepped down to 400v and the car went nuts. The A/C compressor screamed to 6,000 RPMs, the cooling fan went nuts, and you could see cooling system temps start to rise. Everything was functioning normally, and it was still quieter than the Pratt & Whitney JT9D that seems to be hiding under the hood of my Model Y, but the difference was huge.

My takeaway was that 800v charging was extremely efficient and didn't heat things up nearly as much as my prior Supercharging experience with my Model 3. But 400v charging was probably more wasteful because of the losses incurred to step the voltage up.

Here's a video that I took of the data during that charge in Syracuse. I went from 2-90% SOC, and you can clearly see the difference in temperature rise when charging throttled down.

 
“The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it.”

A lot of people fall for this…
In my tests the Model Y adds as much real world 70mph range in 18 minutes as the Ioniq5 does due to the fact it travels further. Yes the Ioniq5 hits 80% in the time the Tesla hits like 68, but in terms of mikes added it’s the same.
Now, I know the EV6 is a little more efficient than the Ioniq5; however it’s nowhere near the Model Y, despite having the disconnecting front motor.
 
“The EV6 is a charging hero, and I don't expect the Model Y will be able to beat it.”

A lot of people fall for this…
In my tests the Model Y adds as much real world 70mph range in 18 minutes as the Ioniq5 does due to the fact it travels further. Yes the Ioniq5 hits 80% in the time the Tesla hits like 68, but in terms of mikes added it’s the same.
Now, I know the EV6 is a little more efficient than the Ioniq5; however it’s nowhere near the Model Y, despite having the disconnecting front motor.

You’re honestly telling a guy who used to own an EV6 that he’s ”falling for this?”

I don’t expect you to believe this random guy on the internet. But that has not been my experience. I monitored the efficiency pretty closely in my EV6 for the 10,500 miles that I had it, and my new Y isn’t doing better.

Some people are convinced that Tesla does all things better than everyone else no matter what. I’ve owned both before making this last switch, and the overall Tesla package is better for my use. But it’s certainly not better at everything.
 
I actually agree with virtually everything you stated in your original post comparing the two, the only exception is the eficiency which I would place roughly halfway between the Ioniq5 and the Y. Granted this is only my experience from renting an EV6 and running 70mph tests, vs owning one, but most YouTube tests I’ve seen seem to line up with my experience. The reason I went with the Y over the ioniq5 and ev6 is the charging issues from the public network which many times cancel out any speed advantage (if you believe there is one) and the fact even initiating a charge adds time when it works. The lack of battery preconditioning also doesn’t help matters, at least for the first charge of the day.
But i stand by my experience that, assuming v3 Suoerchargers and arriving at or under 10% and charging only enough to do another 2 hours at freest speed, the Hyundai/Kia cars are no faster at covering ground. But they’re no slower either. What kills them is the public charging network, and what kills the Y is v2 Suoerchargers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomB985
Completely agree about the reliability of 3rd party CCS stations, though. All of my stops used the EA network because of the free charging pass that came with the car, and it was a very mixed experience. Some were great, but it was rare to find a station that was fully online. Those reliability issues made it impossible to plan.

All of the EV6 models made after July of this year have preconditioning, so I’d expect they would do better in the winter than my early-build. I’m really happy that I don’t have to worry about that anymore with my new Y.
 
Completely agree about the reliability of 3rd party CCS stations, though. All of my stops used the EA network because of the free charging pass that came with the car, and it was a very mixed experience. Some were great, but it was rare to find a station that was fully online. Those reliability issues made it impossible to plan.

All of the EV6 models made after July of this year have preconditioning, so I’d expect they would do better in the winter than my early-build. I’m really happy that I don’t have to worry about that anymore with my new Y.
There is simply NO way that I would consider any EVs no matter how good they are when I have to worry about charging on the road.
Nothing is worth the constant worry!
 
There is simply NO way that I would consider any EVs no matter how good they are when I have to worry about charging on the road.
Nothing is worth the constant worry!
It's weird... how little value ppl place in the charging network. The beauty of ICE is that one can basically not worry about the next station because there are stations literally on every corner. But when it comes to EV they don't act like they give two cents. Now I'm not talking about Tesla ppl but more casuals and non-Teslanians. I read of ppl mentioning the SUC advantage like in passing like just another line item, it's so weird.
 
There is simply NO way that I would consider any EVs no matter how good they are when I have to worry about charging on the road.
Nothing is worth the constant worry!

That's a fact. With all of the money that's gone into it over the previous years, I assumed these issues would be waning. My final straw was my short trip to Madison over Thanksgiving weekend. The Tomah EA station that was 100% last summer was half offline.

There's a ton of investment going into charging infrastructure in the coming months, and it has to get better at some point. Just insane that we're not there yet. Seems like the rest of the developed world got there before the U.S. did. I remember the Supercharger network being first-rate, and they've thrown up a ton of stations during my 18-month "intermission" from the Tesla brand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PecuniaNonOlet
That's a fact. With all of the money that's gone into it over the previous years, I assumed these issues would be waning. My final straw was my short trip to Madison over Thanksgiving weekend. The Tomah EA station that was 100% last summer was half offline.

There's a ton of investment going into charging infrastructure in the coming months, and it has to get better at some point. Just insane that we're not there yet. Seems like the rest of the developed world got there before the U.S. did. I remember the Supercharger network being first-rate, and they've thrown up a ton of stations during my 18-month "intermission" from the Tesla brand.
Having just brought home a '23 Genesis GV60 Performance to go along with my '22 Tesla Model 3 Performance, I'll say that the thing that ALMOST kept us from buying the GV60 is the nightmarish EA DC fast-charging stories I've read on multiple EV forums.

I don't expect us to do too many road trips in general, but we (4 people) will be driving from LaQuinta, CA to Phoenix for New Year's Eve. While I'd rather take the GV60 for its comfort and quiet, I'm worried about the havoc the EA network could inflict on the trip.

What would anyone suggest - should we take the Tesla or the Genesis?