You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I totally agree with the problem and the solution too. It should use the FSD power of the cars that are plugged in and charging. In addition, limit the drain to 10% or less, as long as your battery is charged over 50%. Every available computing source especially the ones Tesla can reach out to easily should be reached out.theoretically that would be a great idea, except they would be using the energy of the parked cars, costing the owners money and potentially draining the battery without them knowing. They could potentially set up some system with supercharging credits but that doesn’t fix the problem of someone coming out to the car and finding the battery 15% lower than they expected
Sorry guys but this is not a practical solution. The main problem with the training phase is not performing the calculation, it is moving the right data into the pipeline for each of the processors so that many operations can be executed in parallel. This is discussed in the Dojo presentations. In addition to this HW3/HW4 are built for inference, not for training. This is why Tesla created Dojo rather than just putting a couple of hundred thousand HW4 systems into a data centre.I totally agree with the problem and the solution too. It should use the FSD power of the cars that are plugged in and charging. In addition, limit the drain to 10% or less, as long as your battery is charged over 50%. Every available computing source especially the ones Tesla can reach out to easily should be reached out.
I disagree. Robotaxi can't work on HW3 or HW4 because neither is capable of cleaning the camera lens--except for the in-windshield cameras. I can't count the number of times FSD has given up due to "occluded cameras" while driving on wet, dirty roads. Unless Robotaxi is only going to operate on dry roads.The last paragraph is especially interesting. Those here who proclaim that robotaxi could never work on HW3 or even HW4 simply don't know. Nobody knows.
A "long shot" is not "dead." Even if it is, what's your point? If Tesla builds it's supercomputer from Nvidia chips instead of in-house Dojo chips, how does that affect End to End AI FSD? Perhaps delay it a bit, which I'm sure we all expect anyway... Either FSD will eventually work at an L3+ level or it won't; I don't see how training on Nvidia GPUs as opposed to Dojo chips really matters.Also, Dojo is dead. DOA. Or did it even arrive? Most of the team leads quit, and the thing doesn't scale. Turns out you can't build a super computer architecture that scales using power point. Musk has gone from pushing it as the solution to everything, to calling it a "long shot" in the latest quarterly call and ordering more stuff from Nvidia.
Hardly dumb - There are other examples of distributed computing even if it doesn’t work in this specific case.My head hurts from reading all the fan-fiction in this thread. Use the customers' the cars for training is the dumbest idea.
At AI Day 2022, Ashok Elluswamy said they've accumulated hundreds of thousands of past failure examples accumulated over many years, and these work more as negative assertions rather than positive adherence. This set is useful in making sure FSD Beta doesn't do something known to be bad whereas there could be multiple good ways to say make a lane change, e.g., change now or wait longer or slow down. These should still be useful in evaluating whether 12.x is doing something it shouldn't be doing.How long does it take to verify a trained network's adherence to the 'specification'
I don't know about the rest of you, but I really did LOL at that one. Hillarious.I’m going to start acting demented and wander aimlessly in S.F. Asking people when V12 is coming out like a junkie.
It's the same mistake that 11.x made because it's still running 11.x on freeways (if you're mainly interested in 12.x behavior).10:50 Disengagement upon encountering a bus lane on an exit ramp. (language warning)
I disagree. Robotaxi can't work on HW3 or HW4 because neither is capable of cleaning the camera lens--except for the in-windshield cameras. I can't count the number of times FSD has given up due to "occluded cameras" while driving on wet, dirty roads. Unless Robotaxi is only going to operate on dry roads.
Uh ohUse the customers' the cars for training is the dumbest idea.
I will say yes to the possibility of this. However I have not encountered this yet in Texas.I disagree. Robotaxi can't work on HW3 or HW4 because neither is capable of cleaning the camera lens--except for the in-windshield cameras. I can't count the number of times FSD has given up due to "occluded cameras" while driving on wet, dirty roads. Unless Robotaxi is only going to operate on dry roads.
I am not aware of the capabilities of the FSD computers in customer’s vehicles. That being said, crowd sourcing is not a new idea and sequencing it around the world is also not a new idea.Sorry guys but this is not a practical solution. The main problem with the training phase is not performing the calculation, it is moving the right data into the pipeline for each of the processors so that many operations can be executed in parallel. This is discussed in the Dojo presentations. In addition to this HW3/HW4 are built for inference, not for training. This is why Tesla created Dojo rather than just putting a couple of hundred thousand HW4 systems into a data centre.
Pick summer time to do the drive. You are telling me it wouldn't be possible for there to be a day in the year where you can map a coast to coast route that avoids rain? Nothing in the definition requires it to be "practical". And as pointed out, it can stop until the rain clears and continue.How exactly would that work given that it takes two days to drive coast to coast and rain is unpredictable?
No one asked him the details, people just assumed because he says L5 he means the same as SAE. As pointed out above, the definition for SAE has a ton of nuance that would disqualify a car from a certain level. And his reference to reliability levels also is inconsistent with SAE definitions (that's not a criteria in SAE's definition).Somehow you've concluded that even though Elon calls it L5 and has never described it in a way inconsistent with SAE L5 he actually has his own secret definition of L5.
You may be right, but how do you know this?It's the same mistake that 11.x made because it's still running 11.x on freeways (if you're mainly interested in 12.x behavior).
Interesting that it's still 12.1.2. I saw that they've been rolling 12.2 out...
As in what to look for? Easiest is probably AUTO MAX set speed with 12.x vs a number with 11.x. Other 11.x control visualizations (e.g., blue highlights) and messages (e.g., changing lanes to follow route) appear on the freeway too. If you pay attention to where it switches between 12.x and 11.x, you can sometimes find hand-off issues, e.g., 12.x performing a lane change getting onto the freeway then 11.x decides it wants to return to the original lane (to then show the message that it needs to follow route before changing lanes).You may be right, but how do you know this?