That's actually hilarious. They basically used one of the cheapest forms of calories, McDonalds, for their walking comparison. Imagine now if you're a hipster who only eats "organic" food.
I actually find it ridiculous.
In order not to die prematurely from lifestyle-associated decease, you need some daily exercise, preferably an hour - probably more if you eat a lot of HFCS like you will at McDonalds. So when walking, you are actually reducing your cost of going to a fitness center (or other health related costs incurred if you did neither).
Along those lines, missing conspicuously from the chart are the data points for cycling and cycling on an electrical bicycle, which for speed and range are near optimal for a city. Not pricing in calories per the above, I spend about 0.05 €/km for my cycling commute (assuming a daily commute of close to 18km 45 work weeks/year, i.e. 40k km in 10 years, 1k€ for a new bike every 10 years and 1k€ for maintenance, clothes and other related consumables). Btw, we cook ourselves at home, I grab a 3€ sandwich for lunch so my calories are covered at a price significantly below that of a fast food restaurant (where I don't go).
But, yes, TSLA may very well reach 4k$ due to their FSD as Ark predicts, the question is just in how many years, and when one should buy TSLA to really cash in on that.
However, with the speed of FSD introduction (also regulatory), I actually think Tesla's coming, tangible products (especially semi, but also truck, Y, energy division) are just as likely to bring Tesla to an evaluation where Elon Musk gets his big bonus (the one at the 650 G$ market cap).
Novice, not advice.
PS. Yes, once I get my Model 3 I will continue to cycle commute (also expecting that my wife "will happen" to borrow the M3 for her commute). So yes, I realize that cycle commuting is not for everyone.