Oh, please, dispense with the patronizing crap. I looked over the document, but do not feel like investing the time to do a close reading. If you or anyone else have a clue as to how it addresses the risk of dilution, you could easily state it and stop with this posturing.
The only thing that seems to suggest a counterbalance to dilution is that Musk already owns a 22% stake in Tesla and would naturally not want to dilute that. The new stock grants, however, are 1% of shares outstanding. So this is a concrete provision that allows Musk to be compensated immune from dilution. The plan could easily have been written based on a fixed number of shares rather than a fixed ratio of shares. So this is a very deliberate choice not to bind Musk to concern about dilution, beyond his pre-existing 22% stake.
It's 1% of shares outstanding on Jan 19 at $350.02. See page 8. So a fixed number of shares.