neroden
Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan
It's in my personal commentary on the earnings call, over in the Q2 results thread.Could someone post that list of the top trade-ins they reported for Model 3 purchases again? Thanks.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's in my personal commentary on the earnings call, over in the Q2 results thread.Could someone post that list of the top trade-ins they reported for Model 3 purchases again? Thanks.
If you believe Econ 101, you're a fool. I've studied this stuff for literally decades. Econ 101 thinking will lead you down the wrong path *every single time*. You have to know a lot more than that.
And we have actual historical data: the fact is that 92% marginal rates on the 0.1% simply don't cause executives to move countries. Do they affect behavior? Sure. Such high marginal rates cause executives to take smaller salaries. (They start looking for other things at the companies they work for: good working conditions, for instance.) Sweden had marginal rates in excess of 100% (!!!!) during my lifetime, and it didn't cause a single Swedish multimillionaire to move -- they like it in Sweden.
A completely different example. Econ 101 claims that multiple competitors will immediately lower their prices to increase profits.
It leaves out *marketing* and *product differentiation*, for god's sake. When I took Microecon 101 I already knew it was wrong.
Could someone post that list of the top trade-ins they reported for Model 3 purchases again? Thanks.
Why not? No problem. I tried not to bring my words into the translation.Hi, do you mind providing a full translation of at least the really critical parts? I'm thinking a lot of the re-telling of the article is adding flavor that didn't exist in the original.
Why not? No problem. I tried not to bring my words into the translation.
Original Article: (paywall but free with registration)
パナソニック、EV電池セル3割増産 テスラ共同工場が世界最大に
Panasonic will increase battery cell manufacturing capacity by 30% from now by the end of 2018, at the Gigafactory in Nevada, USA., which they co-operate with American auto manufaturer Tesla. The planned annual capacity is 35 GWh (Giga means 1 billion) and the batteries are supplied to Tesla's Electric Vehicle, "Model 3". Tesla had production issues from last fall, but it is being resolved. Hence the capacity increase. One year late from the original plan, this is going to be the world biggest battery factory.
Panasonic adds three production lines, totalling 13 lines, to make lithium-ion batteries, to accomodate Tesla's Model 3 production target of 5000 cars per week. The latest production lines are 20%-30% more efficient than existing lines. Total investment of the Gigafactory is five billion dollars (approximately 5000-oku Japanese yen). According to sources, Panasonic pays one third of this investment. At the factory, Panasonic is responsible for upstream production of battery manufacturing (cell manufacturing), and Tesla is responsible for downstream production (assembly).
Model 3 is a very popular car with 500,000 reservations by last summer. However, Tesla struggled to complete fully automated production process and they made less than 3000 cars per week, at the end of May 2018. As a result Panasonic's cell manufacturing lines didn't run full capacity, negatively affecting Panasonic's financials.
At the end of June, Tesla quickly increased Model 3 production up to 5000 cars per week, temporarily. Panasonic was forced to redirect cells for home batteries to Model 3 to cope with the demand. That's why Panasonic plans to increase cell production capacity to originally planned 35 GWh, to support Model 3 stable weekly production of 5000 cars.
Tesla eventually plans to produce 10000 Model 3 cars per week. At that time the Gigafactory need to be expanded and bring the annual production capacity to 50 GWh. Tesla is running out of cash right now and the future is not clear.
Huh, I wasn't expecting this twist at the end.
Unfortunately I've found this to be true with just about everything that I've been an "expert" in. Very sad.Being an "expert" in Tesla has proven to me, without a doubt, just how bad "journalism" is these days. Definitely #fakenews. I see no reason to believe that it's not just as bad on all other subjects. Pick one. We really are in trouble.
Agreed, X Fan -- many if not most Swedish athletes, pop stars, business folk etc moved out, first their money. Even famous theater and film director Ingmar Bergman left the country after being fetched by police, on stage during a rehearsal, over tax issues in the mid-70's. I don't think he was super rich like HM main owner Stefan Persson, who got a special law exempting him from confiscatory taxation if he moved back from London to Sweden."it didn't cause a single Swedish multimillionaire to move"
Don't agree, marginal rates do drive behavior.....ie numerous Euro athletes gravitate to lower tax locations.
Re: Swedish millionaires: Bjorn Borg lives in Monte Carlo, many retired Swedish hockey players live in North America.
As I'm sure you know that when tax rates were confiscatory in the U.S., tax policy allowed a lot more business deductions and free stuff for executives.
Let’s hope they don’t ramp up physical attacks then...I loved the CapEx raise question given the excellent Elon Musk vs. Short sellers analysis. Looks like the attacking their borrowing market train has derailed. And paying off debts!!?? What is this sorcery?
Agreed, X Fan -- many if not most Swedish athletes, pop stars, business folk etc moved out, first their money. Even famous theater and film director Ingmar Bergman left the country after being fetched by police, on stage during a rehearsal, over tax issues in the mid-70's. I don't think he was super rich like HM main owner Stefan Persson, who got a special law exempting him from confiscatory taxation if he moved back from London to Sweden.
Ha! Should we expect a big increase in accounts payable, as the time between delivery and payment increases due to Tesla's difficulty issuing contracts on time? ;-)I believe it! Anyone try to get a Tesla recently? It’s not waiting for a car anymore, it’s getting a pdf from their contracts department that allows them to get paid. That’s going to be the source of cash flow crisis.
Interesting. There still seem to be plenty of superrich people living in Sweden, though, and the country seems to be doing fine.Agreed, X Fan -- many if not most Swedish athletes, pop stars, business folk etc moved out, first their money. Even famous theater and film director Ingmar Bergman left the country after being fetched by police, on stage during a rehearsal, over tax issues in the mid-70's. I don't think he was super rich like HM main owner Stefan Persson, who got a special law exempting him from confiscatory taxation if he moved back from London to Sweden.
To be fair, those >100% rates were on margin and 40-50 years ago. But they did certainly contribute to breaking the thitherto (is that a word ?) hegemony of Social Democrats for 44 years and the first non-S government after Astrid Lindgren (of Pippi fame) started a public fight in the papers with finance minister Sträng. Some 30 years ago S and the Liberal party made a deal to limit income tax to more reasonable levels (while still keeping many hidden, indirect forms of taxation). It took some years still to creep down to 50% total taxation overall, and it soon began to creep back upwards. It has become more difficult to stash money off shore, too. Or so I hearInteresting. There still seem to be plenty of superrich people living in Sweden, though, and the country seems to be doing fine.
Of course, >100% taxation (something I've only seen in Sweden) is really quite different from 92%, and is slightly beyond confiscatory. The formal economic studies on what the optimum rate for maximizing the government budget (i.e. the rate above which people would evade the income tax faster than the tax raised money) have given results between 70%-90%.
Interesting. There still seem to be plenty of superrich people living in Sweden, though, and the country seems to be doing fine.
Of course, >100% taxation (something I've only seen in Sweden) is really quite different from 92%, and is slightly beyond confiscatory. The formal economic studies on what the optimum rate for maximizing the government budget (i.e. the rate above which people would evade the income tax faster than the tax raised money) have given results between 70%-90%.
Also here are some details about US July sales for BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus, Jaguar, that echo Tesla's chart in the Q2 letter.
View attachment 322368