MC3OZ
Active Member
The only real change to my thinking is that there will be fewer larger 4680 factories and all vechicle factories need to be located close enough to cell factories.This is my original 14-factory model, updated slightly in phasing.
I tend to agree with you that Tesla will be slow to put any of its own 4680 cell manufacture in China. The US-IRA clearly makes it more attractive to build out in USA faster now so #9 might come forwards and switch with #5 since India doesn't want to get with the programme. It is still not clear whether they will take some locations to >2m each, for example the footprint of Austin is ginagerous and might get to 5m/yr if labourforce (or cars/labour ..... ) allow. Clearly if the upper size grows >2m then fewer sites are required.
But always when I look at this I find it most odd that Tesla are guiding for 1.8m in 2023, as that would create major ramp difficulties in subsequent years. I am still mulling over what to finalise as my own projection for the year given this. It seems wrong to play pretend-no-growth.
View attachment 900590
Outside of the US, Canada and Germany I am finding it hard to imagine 4680 production anywhere else. My reasoning is that a large portion of the 4680 team would need to relocate to the city where production was being set up for 6 months or more.
And sufficent suitably skilled engineers need to be available
.
From a geography point of view Indonesia, India and Australia is a possibly suitable location.
There might be others.
Last edited: