Exactly, thank you.
I suspect it's because Tesla's attract more techies than they do car enthusiasts.
On the contrary, I've owned many performance cars, including ones that exceed the performance of most Teslas in most regards.
That's one of the reasons I actually understand how worthless brake upgrades are to 99% of actual drivers, and had to explain that fact to you
So people buy them to drive around town and think straight line power is God.
Right. That's about 99% of drivers. Even ones buying performance cars.
Tesla is pretty obviously directing their own performance line to exactly that vast majority of the market.
Although, looking at said person above's post history, it seems like they just go around this forum trying to start arguments and post overly verbose, double spaced posts in response as some weird self-righteous ego trip.
Ah, personal attacks, the last resort of those who know they got beat on facts
Performance cars need performance brakes.
Except in non-track use, they
factually do not
Which again is how most owners actually use their cars.
You are the fringe exception to that- and that's fine- I have no doubt there'll be aftermarket options available to you.
In the meantime the other 99% of owners aren't having to pay for a brake upgrade they'll get
zero benefit from just so you can get it that way from the factory.
If you want to complain about an apparent lack of an upgrade performance models
need it should be an upgraded suspension.
that at least, unlike a brake upgrade, has real-world benefits outside of dedicated track driving.
And hopefully if they ever do offer a brake upgrade they'll at least manage to avoid MarketingFever and not throw DRILLED rotors on there like so many "performance" cars you seem to like come with, since they're functionally inferior to solid or slotted rotors of the same size.