...another stick to be beaten with...
What Tesla needs is users' feedback.
I don't know how Tesla works but it seems only to get users's feedback afterward and not before.
Historically, this has repeatedly caused problems for second-guessing what users want.
Some simple feedbacks were:
1) Cupholders: How hard could it be that Tesla was so resistant to fix the awkward position until the correct position for Model 3.
2) Coat hangers: Again, Tesla was so resistant until it provides them for Model 3.
3) Don't degrade home charging speed of S and X to Model 3's inferior level: When the X first came out, there as a big cry of degrading existing home charging from 80A from Model S to 42A current Model 3. It finally settled to 72A.
4) Unfoldable second row Model X: It was a scandal when it knew that it showed on its presentation that the second row of Model X would fold flat but its final production was unfoldable! It took a public cry afterward in order for Tesla to take users' wishes seriously and currently make it foldable.
This is an unnecessary self-induced crisis.
Why must it be a crisis in order for Tesla to listen to its customers' voices?
I am glad that many are pleased with V9 design that I can't even place my rearview camera on top and a third party map on a browser on bottom.
But that doesn't mean Tesla have to take other user-configurable capability away.
We are not talking about asking for the moon or any new features. That split screen capability has been active for the past 6 years.
Pull the rug from under our feet after 6 years is just mean or gross incompetent!
Thus, please write to Tesla and tell them to preserve Model S and X user top-half/bottom half configurable capability.