Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Investor Engineering Discussions

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
All energy to the fridge is waste heat.
Efficency is how much energy is required to
  • transfer energy from the food to the room (which itself is also waste heat, until food is removed)
  • cancel the heat gain due to imperfect insulation
Any appliance's usage becomes waste heat in a closed system (other than endothermic cooking processes)
Yup, I wasn't thinking about it correctly, all energy used by the fridge does get put into the surrounding air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mongo
Jason says 99% of them need a pack replacement.

The point was that the seller should NOT have reset the BMS and sold the car!

We don't know how the seller came about with a car that needed a battery pack replacement, but the problem is that the seller encountered a fault, reset the BMS and then sold the cars to unsuspecting buyers. Buyers who TSLAQ have been citing as people who bought a Tesla that "looked" fine and encountered a battery issue that required a $20k replacement shortly after. Sorry if that wasn't clarified in my earlier response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: navguy12
We don't know how the seller came about with a car that needed a battery pack replacement, but the problem is that the seller encountered a fault, reset the BMS and then sold the cars to unsuspecting buyers.
We also don't know if the seller knew reseting the BMS was a problem. They may have taken it to a shop that told them it was a real fix.
 
I'd be interested in seeing that from wk057, he generally has pretty insightful commentary on the setups. Perhaps indeed newer inverters can accept such, but if you say the FSD computer sends it's "desired position and how it would like to get there", that would imply the inverter has some knowledge of things like current location, car orientation, steering angles, etc... things I'd expect FSD to know rather than the inverter... and I doubt the inverter is being told about them real time.

I could see the inverter being given things like time/distance/acceleration maximums (i.e. g-force limits), and it then calculating the torque commands necessary to do that...

I will try to dig a bit more to see if I can find it again

I'm sure there can be another way to be done, but I think it's interesting that Tesla went this way instead of the FSD computer commanding torque and speed, and with multiple cross check on the way

And also my main point is, is this easy to change? SHOULD it be changed? Probably a big reason to be done like that

The thread:
 


As the term “bipolar” indicates, the current collector can be shared by a cathode and an anode. This technique reduces the number of parts and thus enables the battery to be made more compact. It is also possible to stack a larger number of cells. In addition, since bipolar batteries have a wider electrical path and a simpler construction, there is lower resistance within the battery itself. This enables the flow of larger currents, achieving approximately twice the output of the conventional nickel-metal hydride battery equipped in the previous-generation Aqua.

I don't think Toyota's battery technology is "smoke and mirrors", but I also don't think it represents a serious challenge to Tesla anytime soon.

IMO Tesla also has some serious battery innovations in the pipeline and for the next decade price and volume are the most important metrics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dikkie Dik
Isn't the bipolar setup basically building a serial circuit within a single cell?

Yes, there is a helpful diagram from Toyota in the document I linked.

I don't have the information handy, but there is some connection between their solid-sate battery and their bipolar cell.

I think they are doing innovative R&D, which is why it is taking so long.

Even if the resulting battery is great, the other relevant questions come into play:-
  1. Longevity - how many cycles?
  2. Yield / fault rate - production quality.
  3. Ability to scale- how long for multiple GWh of production?
  4. Cost - how much per kWh?
if I was Toyota I would start by making the best battery possible, then work on 1.-4.

If a great solution for all problems is 20 years into the future, I don't think Tesla needs to be overly worried about this, Toyota has some tough hurdles to clear in the next 5-10 years just to remain a significant part of the industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RabidYak
I know this isn't the Investor Chemistry Discussions thread, but just in case anyone among us has a chemistry background, I've noticed something strange about the information included with the shipments of the Burnt Hair perfume. Here's the information card included in the box:

1688649717587.png


The thing that stands out is "Isoeugenol." Generally speaking, it's an essential oil that naturally occurs in wood smoke, but can be synthesized and is used as a precursor in the synthesis of other chemicals (e.g. vanillin). Makes sense that it's where the perfume gets its smokey scent, but legally speaking, could have been included as a component of "Parfum" and didn't need to be explicitly identified.

The conspiratorial part of me is wondering whether Isoeugenol is being used in, or is a byproduct of, some other chemical process by the Boring Company/Tesla/SpaceX. Tried looking for possible links to battery chemistry, only thing I can find is from Google Search Generative AI, but I cannot tell if it's just hallucinating.

1688650759627.png


Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: MC3OZ and jerry33
Much harder problem that charge connector on the implementation side. Maybe that is really what they need dojo for in the future, to retrain on different geometry cars/camera systems, massive amounts of new data needed. What storage vendor does Tesla use? :)
Theoretically, only the front end camera->voxel mapping portion would need to update.
However, it seems like Tesla is talking end-to-end all in one NN these days which removes such boundaries. In which case, yeah need to retrain with the new feeds or back-processed versions of the existing fleet data (more likely).
 
  • Like
Reactions: CorneliusXX