Living in Oregon, I'm one of those numbers, but I'm really surprised Oregon is such chart topper. We're higher Wh/m than states that are much colder with significantly worse weather conditions, like Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, etc.
We get a lot of rain, but does the extra rolling resistance from rain really make that big a difference?
That's an interesting question. I certainly observe a big increase in wh/mile when I drive in the rain. But I'm not sure what hard numbers are for wet pavement vs dry pavement. In another thread Todd Burch noted that rolling resistance for the Model S is about 1/3 of the air drag (which is a lot - most cars rolling is much less than air drag), partly because the car is very aerodynamic and mostly because the car is so heavy. So if we had an estimate for how much rolling resistance increases on wet vs dry pavement, we could get a rough estimate for the effect on wh/m.
Thinking a bit more, rolling resistance probably isn't affected much by rain. But there could be two other effects. One is just hitting the rain with the car thereby increasing drag, and the other is the tires kicking up lots of water and throwing it behind or under the car. I assume this has been studied?