EVNow
Well-Known Member
This has nothing to do with any EV adoption delay. They'll happily make EVs instead of ICE.Unionized ICE and transmission assembly workers
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This has nothing to do with any EV adoption delay. They'll happily make EVs instead of ICE.Unionized ICE and transmission assembly workers
People always forget about the Tesla SC network. Nobody else has it and therefore no matter how good a Toyota EV will be, those owners will have many more concerns about long drives than Tesla owners.I don't think they're excusing him, just accepting reality. If Toyota was coming to market with a $45k, 300+ mile, EV sport sedan this year, I might spring for that, even if it looked like the current Prius (I would have to think a lot about it though).
But everyone, Toyota included, is years, or even decades behind Tesla. People excuse production delays, some problems with quality (I think the 3 will be better than the S/X), and partially finished UIs/features because Elon is the only one willing to build a competitive EV.
If someone did it better than he does, I'm sure he would bow out and invest his time in something else to help humanity. Unfortunately for us, the established players in the auto world can't find their EVs in the dark with both hands.
Absolutely I agree with you 100%.People always forget about the Tesla SC network. Nobody else has it and therefore no matter how good a Toyota EV will be, those owners will have many more concerns about long drives than Tesla owners.
People always forget about the Tesla SC network. Nobody else has it and therefore no matter how good a Toyota EV will be, those owners will have many more concerns about long drives than Tesla owners.
Indeed long distance SC'ing may be a challenge, however imagine for a moment if it didn't exist.I'm not sure people forget that.
The reality just is, the real paradigm shift in BEV use is the home/work charging. For many people, 90%, perhaps close to 100% of the time charging overnight or over working day is sufficient.
Long-distance charging is a chore, even with Tesla's network. It is not a strong suit of BEVs anyway. But luckily many people don't really need long-distance driving that much...
A much, much, much bigger hindrance is that pretty much only Tesla sells large-battery BEVs at this time. Large battery will make the everyday driving easier, because you don't have to plan small detours and not even remember to charge daily...
This has nothing to do with any EV adoption delay. They'll happily make EVs instead of ICE.
Indeed long distance SC'ing may be a challenge, however imagine for a moment if it didn't exist.
I'm not sure people forget that.
The reality just is, the real paradigm shift in BEV use is the home/work charging. For many people, 90%, perhaps close to 100% of the time charging overnight or over working day is sufficient.
Long-distance charging is a chore, even with Tesla's network. It is not a strong suit of BEVs anyway. But luckily many people don't really need long-distance driving that much...
A much, much, much bigger hindrance is that pretty much only Tesla sells large-battery BEVs at this time. Large battery will make the everyday driving easier, because you don't have to plan small detours and not even remember to charge daily...
I see what you are saying.I do, where I live it doesn't cover much and where it is available suitably, the charge time rarely works for me. I end up taking the ICE for many long distances, but then those are quite rare anyway...
No matter, people bought Teslas even before Superchargers where installed anywhere. People even buy commuting EVs with small batteries (with large batteries the commuting radius grows massively)...
Not everyone just drives long distance - and some who do, for them Supercharging won't solve it anyway.
Now, this does not mean there aren't people for whom Supercharging is a mandatory requirement. Sure there are. But in the meanwhile there is plenty of market to saturate with large-battery BEVs (of which there are pretty much none but Teslas today) even without SpC equivalents...
I see what you mean since there are absolutely NO SC's in eastern Canada yet.Bingo. I have little care for SCN since it is going to be more expensive than home charging and almost as expensive as refueling our toyota hybrid. It is not free for Model 3 owners anyway.
Other charging networks will catch up at least in terms of users per charging station. Maybe 2k on the SCN for 400k Teslas five years from now.
I see what you are saying.
I see what you mean since there are absolutely NO SC's in eastern Canada yet.
Not just about availability but also the cost of charging is 20 cents CAD per kWh on the SCN. At home night charging is about 12 cents. Former is equivalent to around 5-6 cents per km while our RAV4 hybrid costs around 7-8 cents.
with potential delays of having to queue at the SCN for a few hours once more Teslas are on the road.
I'm not sure people forget that.
The reality just is, the real paradigm shift in BEV use is the home/work charging. For many people, 90%, perhaps close to 100% of the time charging overnight or over working day is sufficient.
Long-distance charging is a chore, even with Tesla's network. It is not a strong suit of BEVs anyway. But luckily many people don't really need long-distance driving that much...
A much, much, much bigger hindrance is that pretty much only Tesla sells large-battery BEVs at this time. Large battery will make the everyday driving easier, because you don't have to plan small detours and not even remember to charge daily...
By contrast, our electricity is cheap, but our fuel is incredibly expensive. Even the most efficient hybrid cars don't come close to the operating costs of the most inefficient electric cars.
Every place is different.
There's no way Tesla is going to let that happen. Especially now that they're transforming Superchargers from loss leaders to profit centres.
Also, superchargers aren't just about trips: they're about security. The knowledge that if you have a supercharger somewhere around you, you don't have to worry about being stranded for hours if you mess up or have to make unexpected trips. Superchargers are to a non-trip-taker what CHAdeMOs are to a trip taker: not part of the plan, but you're glad that they're there if you need to use them.
The tax credit will most likely be full through June and half from July-December. That’s why I said 200,000 x $7500 and 200,000 x $3750, or $2.25 billion in lost revenue for the government. Republicans who talk about lower taxes should love the credit since it just gives back money you pay in and not someone else’s money.The point is taken but, the math's off though. It wouldn't be 200,000 x $7,500 next year. All of the Tesla Roadster, S, X and the few 3s that have ever been sold (and will be sold the rest of this year) in the US will count towards the initial 200,000.
See Federal Tax Credits for Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Cars (look for Phaseout).
I'd think somewhere around 40,000 Teslas may get the full credit next year. And, from thereon, it's by the quarter and not by number sold.
Personally, I don't think Congress will bother with this one.
Who wants to go to a dealership and sit (for up to two and a half hours in a Chevy Bolt on DC fast charging) while on a long trip? Tesla is still the only option I’d consider.Most likely Chevy and Toyota will expand their chargers at the dealers. Should be L3's. But now the chargers in place (L2's), which most dealers let Teslas use for free happen to close at night and in some places on Sunday.
Most likely Chevy and Toyota will expand their chargers at the dealers.