WilliamG
Hinge Fanatic
People need to take that into account when they're complaining about the new pricing. It's not the same car.
To be fair, though, this is not new info.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People need to take that into account when they're complaining about the new pricing. It's not the same car.
LOL, just seemed crazy not to include those cables as they're so cheap to make. Oh well...just the inconvenience that I'm annoyed about, not so much that I have to pay to get them.People need to take that into account when they're complaining about the new pricing. It's not the same car.
Yes but it warns you that it is not recommended without the upgraded brakes and suspension. Lol
Can you tell us what you paid before taxes and fees? That would put the InsideEVs nonsense to rest.
People need to take that into account when they're complaining about the new pricing. It's not the same car.
You're right. I only saw it briefly at the SC when picking up the car so I didn't read it carefully enough. Probably the same screen all performance models see I take it?That's odd, my P3D- has no such statement. It says Track Mode "is designed to be used by experienced track drivers familiar with the course. Do not use on public roads."
It also says "Track Mode was designed for vehicles with the Performance Upgrade Package. Performance and endurance is comparatively lower without performance tires and brakes."
Nowhere does it say they don't recommend using it unless you have upgraded brakes and suspension. In fact, suspension is not even mentioned and the part about lower performance and endurance being less without performance brakes and tires is pretty much a given to anyone who understands the difference between the two. They didn't say "we don't recommend it".
Can you supply a source for that claim?
Oh no. You have summoned @Knightshade!I find it hard to believe that the M3P- without the 20" Performance tires will have the same 0-60 as the M3P+ with.
At least this makes sense. Glad we got this clarified. So the table and Electrek is garbage.
I find it hard to believe that the M3P- without the 20" Performance tires will have the same 0-60 as the M3P+ with.
The brakes on the P3D+ are also a lot, lot better than the standard brakes:
From MotorTrend:
Besides the variable-rate electricity-regenerative braking that uses the motors to slow the vehicle, the Model 3's traditional disc brakes haul the car from 60 to 0 mph in 99 feet, on par with some formidable performers. This ties the GT350R and Giulia Quadrifoglio from above, as well as two 2016 Cadillacs: the ATS-V and CTS-V. It's also shorter than a couple of 2016 BMWs: the M4 GTS and M3 Competition. Here are a few contemporaneous notes from the test track. "The Model 3 DMB has a very firm brake pedal, without much travel or feel, but the brakes are highly effective and consistent. I did one stop from 100 mph (the second one) and got them rather hot and a saw a puff of smoke when the car stopped. On the next pass, the distance shrank to the shortest stop (99 feet), so the brakes are capable of dissipating heat well. In order: 100, 105, and 99 feet."
When you chart the data (above), there's an absolutely straight line showing the car shedding speed in a linear fashion. Also, when looking at g-loads, there are no dips or spikes. It's pretty much 1.2 g from 60 mph down to a halt. —Chris Walton
2018 Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Performance Quick Test Review - MotorTrend
Versus the Standard Brakes on 18" Aeros:
Our initial 2017 Tesla Model 3 full-ABS panic-stop measurement of 133 feet was indeed below average. But it didn't seem outrageous, especially given the characteristics of the standard 18-inch tires. They're hard (with a treadwear rating of 500), they run at an abnormally high tire pressure (45 psi), and their 235 mm tread width isn't generous considering the car's 3,884 pounds of weight.
Stopping Distance Retest After an ABS Firmware Update - 2017 Tesla Model 3 Long-Term Road Test
Or:
Tesla claimed an average of 133 feet in their own tests.
Tesla Model 3 stopping distance improvements confirmed in new test, Musk says UI/ride comfort improvements coming - Electrek
-------------------------
I've seen numbers in the low 120s for 60-0, too, but either way..., the brakes on the P3D+ I feel are more than worth it. They're simply excellent, and in an emergency braking situation the regular brakes are mediocre at best.
They're better for repeated high speed stops but they probably don't stop you any faster in street use. I put PS4S tires on my AWD and my 60-0 stopping distance dropped to 105ft from 125ft (measured with VBOX sport). The brakes are plenty powerful enough to activate the ABS.The brakes on the P3D+ are also a lot, lot better than the standard brakes:
They're better for repeated high speed stops but they probably don't stop you any faster in street use. I put PS4S tires on my AWD and my 60-0 stopping distance dropped to 105ft from 125ft (measured with VBOX sport). The brakes are plenty powerful enough to activate the ABS.
The brakes on the P3D+ are also a lot, lot better than the standard brakes
LOL, just seemed crazy not to include those cables as they're so cheap to make. Oh well...just the inconvenience that I'm annoyed about, not so much that I have to pay to get them.
I would strongly urge you to read this article for a deeper understanding of why it's physically impossible for "bigger brakes" to stop the car any shorter than the stock regular ones do in such tests, and why the entire difference in stopping distance you cite is the difference in the tires.
GRM Pulp Friction