bonnie
I play a nice person on twitter.
I stated only what I remembered of the discussion. I did not go read your blog before I posted. I have now since gone and read it:
That was, as far as I can understand it, the end result of the service required. You said that Tesla didn't want to let you drive home in it.
Now, the car didn't actually die on you, but if Tesla was reticent to have you drive it and you had to have the most expensive component in the entire car replaced after Tesla looked at it, then I am comfortable saying that's a pretty major event.
My intent was not to mischaracterize it, but in discussions of technical/mechanical issues with Tesla's cars, I think that qualifies.
Context matters. Yes, those specific words were in my blog. Also in my blog were the words, "My car was fully charged, operating perfectly." I took exception your statement asserting my car died on the trip (since I was there and that did not happen). My blog also mentions that I suspect they took the battery for reasons having to do with engineering knowledge, rather than drivability. But of course, I don't KNOW that. I only believe that is a possibility. And if I don't know that, then outside of Tesla Service, none of us know that either.
It's fair to want to know what the reliability of the cars are - but of your two examples, one was not correct and the other doesn't have enough context to draw any real conclusions. And of course, as others have noted, the Model S is not the Roadster, which was an early-adopter, image-building, proof-that-EVs-can-be-exciting halo car. Different scenario.