Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Newer P90DL makes 662 hp at the battery!!!

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Status
Not open for further replies.
70D Numbers - 95 %

70D Numbers.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma
tested both, not a significant difference...

19" wheels, 100% SOC, 15 min between runs:

0-60 MPH: 2.548, 2.562
0-100 MPH: 6.434, 6.495
1/8 mile: 6.838 @ 102.507, 6.854 @ 102.33
1/4 mile: 10.785 @ 123.99, 10.809 @ 123.64

1 hour to swap wheels while charging to 100% SOC

21" wheels, 100% SOC, 10 min between runs
0-60 MPH: 2.507, 2.603
0-100 MPH: 6.456, 6.505
1/8 mile: 6.815 @ 102.396, 6.871 @ 102.512
1/4 mile: 10.766 @ 123.910, 10.836 @ 123.149
 
tested both, not a significant difference...

19" wheels, 100% SOC, 15 min between runs:

0-60 MPH: 2.548, 2.562
0-100 MPH: 6.434, 6.495
1/8 mile: 6.838 @ 102.507, 6.854 @ 102.33
1/4 mile: 10.785 @ 123.99, 10.809 @ 123.64

1 hour to swap wheels while charging to 100% SOC

21" wheels, 100% SOC, 10 min between runs
0-60 MPH: 2.507, 2.603
0-100 MPH: 6.456, 6.505
1/8 mile: 6.815 @ 102.396, 6.871 @ 102.512
1/4 mile: 10.766 @ 123.910, 10.836 @ 123.149
Yeah, hard to pick a winner there.
 
in my P100D on vbox,

0-60 in 2.507, 0-100 in 6.43, 10.76 @ @ 124 MPH

powertools peak, 559kW

That's very impressive. :)

But then again, no significant improvement over the latest P90DL iterations. It seems a bit familiar to what we saw with the P90D and P85D initially. Unless the motor is now the primary limiting factor, I think we'll see some good incremental performance improvements with later 100kWh batteries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma
@St Charles ,
NDR 10.78, fiks 10.76 in the 1/4.

Looks like my "improper" adjustment for weight didn't hurt my prediction of 10.77 for the 1/4 too much.

Hey man, if you want to come up with a new theorem for Vaught's conjecture while you calculate possible performance numbers of the P100D, be my guest. It seems to me that maybe we should try to simplify the approach. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma
But then again, no significant improvement over the latest P90DL iterations. It seems a bit familiar to what we saw with the P90D and P85D initially. Unless the motor is now the primary limiting factor, I think we'll see some good incremental performance improvements with later 100kWh batteries.
It looks like they are at the motor limits now. If increased range is any indication, the 100kwh battery has 15kwh more capacity than the 90kwh battery, not just 10kwh. So they could have gotten more performance out of the battery. The current motor shaft horsepower is based on the earlier realistically quoted 690 battery horsepower of the motors. It's nowhere near as high as the battery could deliver even at the current 760 battery horsepower.
 
Last edited:
It looks like they are at the motor limits now. If increased range is any indication, the 100kwh battery has 15kwh more capacity than the 90kwh battery, not just 10kwh. So they could have gotten more performance out of the battery. The current motor shaft horsepower is based on the earlier realistically quoted 690 battery horsepower of the motors. It's nowhere near as high as the battery could deliver even at the current 760 battery horsepower.

Like you, I am not as concerned with the peak as I am with sustained power delivery. based on the initial graphs people have posted here, the P100D power output seems to start dropping earlier than the latest revisions of the P90DL. I'd be happier with a 500kW output if it went all the way to 120MPH vs 550kW output that falls off at 90MPH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma and davidc18
Like you, I am not as concerned with the peak as I am with sustained power delivery. based on the initial graphs people have posted here, the P100D power output seems to start dropping earlier than the latest revisions of the P90DL. I'd be happier with a 500kW output if it went all the way to 120MPH vs 550kW output that falls off at 90MPH.

That could only be done by a change in gearing, which would increase 0-60, or a complete rework of the motor. Maybe we will see some changes once the Model 3 motor is out. I am hoping for a triple motor Model S, two in the back one in the front.
 
But then again, no significant improvement over the latest P90DL iterations. It seems a bit familiar to what we saw with the P90D and P85D initially. Unless the motor is now the primary limiting factor, I think we'll see some good incremental performance improvements with later 100kWh batteries.
The p100 is about .2 seconds quicker than the most recent P90 versions in the eighth and quarter-mile.that is a significant improvement.
The only P90 to run in the tens is the TRC version. When they ran head to head The P100 beat it by .2 in the 8th mile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma
That could only be done by a change in gearing, which would increase 0-60, or a complete rework of the motor. Maybe we will see some changes once the Model 3 motor is out. I am hoping for a triple motor Model S, two in the back one in the front.

I don't think that's true. The P90DL "V3" sustains power until 95MPH before dropping. Take A look at this graph posted at Dragtimes. The P110D graph looks a lot like a battey at it's limits where the P90 looks a lot more calculated. There is a good reason why the two have vary similar 1/4 mile times and it's because the P100D cant sustain it's higher power levels nearly as long.
 

Attachments

  • Tesla-P100DL-vs-P90DLv3-power-output-graph.jpg
    Tesla-P100DL-vs-P90DLv3-power-output-graph.jpg
    124.8 KB · Views: 45
The p100 is about .2 seconds quicker than the most recent P90 versions in the eighth and quarter-mile.that is a significant improvement.
The only P90 to run in the tens is the TRC version. When they ran head to head The P100 beat it by .2 in the 8th mile.

No, it's not. TRC has made a 10.8 pass in a P90DL with a 108xxx battery. Show me a P100D 10.6 timeslip...
 
  • Like
Reactions: soooma
Status
Not open for further replies.