e-FTW
New electron smell
I had a 2015 RWD Model S 70 with a sunroof, coil suspension and Autopilot (v1). So the cheapest, slowest, base Model S.
The one thing I miss is the massive hatchback form factor. Much easier for putting in bikes or moving things. But then again, I’ve not yet encountered this situation with my Perfromance Model 3. So a lot of this can be hypothetical. The overall size of the S is pretty great when you need to move a family and/or gear. I do not have that need. And you can still seat 5 in the 3, just pick skinnier folks. ;-)
Oh yeah, the S looks darn good. That design does not age at all!
Overall, the 3 wins hands-down, for many reasons already quoted here. In my case, I have a much faster, modern, capable car for about the same money, and for about the same efficiency (the AWD 3s suck the juice much more than the RWD ones). So you could say that I would the most likely to want another S becasue of those two facts (money and efficiency).
I would not trade my 3 for an S. This could be revisitied for some once the S get s a refresh, but not for me. I like smaller cars, so the 3’s size is a welcome change.
(On another note, I am surprised by folks that say they miss the smooth ride of the air suspension. I have had a few Service loaners over the years, and they were always air suspension: the immediate back-to back on the same roads with my S and then my 3 always made air suspension look bad. It is rougher in my opinion than my S’ coils and the 3’s. No question about it. The coils, in the S especially with its longer wheelbase, seem much better at handling concrete road surfaces, cracks and small bumps.)
The one thing I miss is the massive hatchback form factor. Much easier for putting in bikes or moving things. But then again, I’ve not yet encountered this situation with my Perfromance Model 3. So a lot of this can be hypothetical. The overall size of the S is pretty great when you need to move a family and/or gear. I do not have that need. And you can still seat 5 in the 3, just pick skinnier folks. ;-)
Oh yeah, the S looks darn good. That design does not age at all!
Overall, the 3 wins hands-down, for many reasons already quoted here. In my case, I have a much faster, modern, capable car for about the same money, and for about the same efficiency (the AWD 3s suck the juice much more than the RWD ones). So you could say that I would the most likely to want another S becasue of those two facts (money and efficiency).
I would not trade my 3 for an S. This could be revisitied for some once the S get s a refresh, but not for me. I like smaller cars, so the 3’s size is a welcome change.
(On another note, I am surprised by folks that say they miss the smooth ride of the air suspension. I have had a few Service loaners over the years, and they were always air suspension: the immediate back-to back on the same roads with my S and then my 3 always made air suspension look bad. It is rougher in my opinion than my S’ coils and the 3’s. No question about it. The coils, in the S especially with its longer wheelbase, seem much better at handling concrete road surfaces, cracks and small bumps.)