You could say this is my "riding off into the sunset" post for this thread, although as one of the TMC moderators it's not like I'm going to disappear. (Well some of you might want me to disappear but anyway...
)
Friday I picked up my (now one month old) Palladium (a.k.a. "Refresh") Long Range Model X from OCDetailing, where it was getting a clear PPF wrap. Today (Sunday) I took it on a shakedown cruise from the San Francisco Bay Area to Kettleman City (roughly 400 mile round trip). This was the first chance I had to take the car out on the open road, and it was basically a test prior to using it for some family road trips this summer.
TLDR: Everything worked great, all systems operational.
Various impressions from this drive (about 5 hours driving time), coming from a 2015 Model S 85D:
The seats are way more comfortable (my S has the first-generation leather seats, which are OK around town but not very comfortable on long trips). Lots more roomy interior, which is nice.
Definitely less cabin noise than the S. I guess this isn't a huge surprise. I'm not sure if active noise cancelling did anything (it did claim to have done its calibration and to be "optimized for front occupants" or something like that). Nothing rattling around that I could tell.
The large glass windshield is a big change from the solid roof on my S. It makes everything feel more open, but there's more heat and light. The cabin was definitely warmer than I would have expected, still reasonably comfortable today (May), but I'm wondering how this would drive would go in, say, August. (It gets hot in the San Joaquin Valley during summer, as I know from growing up there.) Also a hat and/or sunglasses are probably a good idea for long trips.
The center armrest is actually usable on the X. Lots of storage space compared to my S (it has the yacht floor, no center console). I didn't think I'd say this but having the wireless phone chargers is pretty nice.
I thought it was interesting that the "heading up" view on the nav display doesn't seem to be exactly a top-down view like what I'm used to seeing, but it's more of a perspective view.
Autopilot worked great for freeway driving. No phantom braking in 400 miles. I'm less sure about Nav on Autopilot...I didn't care for the decisions it made about when to change lanes. I'm not sure if some setting on the Autopilot screen would make this work more like I'd expect. But in any case, basic lane keeping, etc. worked almost as well as AP1 (which I have literally used since Day One of its roll-out). The 80mph limit on auto steer is mildly annoying but it's not hugely different from the 85mph limit on AP1 (and I hear it's supposed to be raised soon).
The yoke is kind of a non-issue as far as driving with it. Once again getting used to lack of stalks. One issue with the yoke is that for me it blocks the lower left corner of the MCU screen. There are two controls there that are somewhat important. One is the control that changes the map orientation ("heading up", "trip", "north up", etc.). The other is the control that brings up the car settings, and other information. I normally wouldn't care about the settings screen, except that's apparently the only way to view the tire pressure or the trip meters (my S is usually displaying one of those on the left side of the IC).
Partially because of the yoke, I'm not sure whether I like a landscape orientation MCU screen or a portrait orientation MCU screen better. In any case both the MCU screen and the IC are much more legible than on my S.
There are now 3 ways to get into the car (key card, phone key, and fob), whereas on the S I only had the fob. I think I might stick with the old-fashioned fob...I'm used to it by now and also that's the only access method that allows easy opening of the frunk (which we often use for leftovers or takeout food).
I was surprised to realize the frunk isn't flat on the bottom (neither is the under-floor trunk storage). This doesn't make a lot of sense to me, although it's a minor issue. I wonder if the X has always been like that?
Trip summary:
I left home with 100% charge (348 rated miles). The basic route was southbound on I-5, to return northbound via the same route. After about 2.5 hours, I arrived at the Kettleman City, CA Supercharger (the original one with the owners lounge) with 31% charge left. I pulled in to one of the V3 stalls and almost immediately the car was pulling 250kW (the maximum). By comparison my Model S can theoretically do about 120kW but only briefly under exactly the right set of circumstances. 23 minutes was enough for the X to add 50% charge to the battery and for me to use the restroom and get a drink. One thing I didn't quite have the nerve to try was opening the FWDs next to the Supercharger pedestals.
From Kettleman City I drove across the highway to the second Kettleman City (Bernard Drive) Supercharger and plugged in there for the first time. (Why? To record this as a site in the "Most Superchargers Visited" competition.) There was only one other car there. I picked up 9% in 12 minutes, pulling out with 92% on the battery. This site will be a lot nicer once it's paved.
Just north of the Harris Ranch Supercharger is a big cattle lot. You can often smell it before you can see it. Bioweapon defense mode worked wonderfully...I literally didn't notice a thing.
I'd originally planned to come back straight home from Kettleman City, but there was quite a lot of headwind going northbound. I opted to stop at Patterson for a brief charge (11 minutes, leaving with 65% SOC). I got back home with a very comfortable 37% SOC.
Admittedly a weird way to spend a Sunday...driving 200 miles, turning around, and driving back. But this was a great way to get some good experience with the car and get some confidence that all the major systems are working.
Thanks to all in this thread for your experiences, advice, and support. I hope everyone who's still awaiting their vehicles get cars in perfect condition, on schedule.
Bruce.
View attachment 799616