You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can we discuss Q4 S&P 500? Is it possible given that GF3 is delivering ~100 vehicles/day? How many deliveries+roofs would you guess would be needed? What is the number to beat?
Can we discuss Q4 S&P 500? Is it possible given that GF3 is delivering ~100 vehicles/day? How many deliveries+roofs would you guess would be needed? What is the number to beat?
Or the stored up p&l from FSD. For which time has also by now run out this quarter for a mass release.Only way it could happen is if Tesla recognized a huge lump payment from FCA for EU emission fleet pooling all in single quarter. And that won’t happen.
FSD revenue can't be recognized until they upgrade everyone to HW3.Or the stored up p&l from FSD. For which time has also by now run out this quarter for a mass release.
I imagine they could recognise it progressively, as each vehicle with the option has the BBC capability. Don’t all units sold since April already have HW3?FSD revenue can't be recognized until they upgrade everyone to HW3.
Should gave GAAP profit over previous 4 quarters.
Q1 -702
Q2 -389
Q3 150
Q4 needs profit of 941 million, not super likely.
However, Q1 2020 + Q4 only needs to be 239 million combined. The Q3 '19, Q3 '18 (311) and Q4 (139) '18 profit levels are all sufficient to achieve that. Any improvement (or tie) in sales over last quarter should be sufficient.
Some simplified math that is not the complete picture but just to illustrate that a deeper look might be warrented.
Required profit increase Q3->Q4= +791
Production went from:
Q2->Q3: 87k->96k=+9k
Profit went from
Q2->Q3 = +539
I think Q3->Q4 production will increase more than 9k, more like 20k.
I also think solar will increase more in Q3->Q4 than in Q2->Q3. Are there new other efficiencies. Is there a chance that Model S/X production increased much more in Q3->Q4 than in Q2->Q3?
Just saying that just extrapolating from Q2->Q3 we are already pretty close and Tesla has surprised us before. Nobody is expecting this, and maybe for good reasons. But are we really sure there won’t be a big surprise at the ER?
Profit didn't go up because of just production increase. It was because of margin improvement + 115M in one time profits.Production went from:
Q2->Q3: 87k->96k=+9k
Profit went from
Q2->Q3 = +539
I think Q3->Q4 production will increase more than 9k, more like 20k.
Yes. But the chances of rollout of City NOA in next 3 weeks is near zero. Ofcourse, FSD revenue from HW3 cars can be recognized instantly when City NOA rolls out (but would be only NA in the beginning).I imagine they could recognise it progressively, as each vehicle with the option has the BBC capability. Don’t all units sold since April already have HW3?
Agreed. In short, no S&P after Q4.Yes. But the chances of rollout of City NOA in next 3 weeks is near zero. Ofcourse, FSD revenue from HW3 cars can be recognized instantly when City NOA rolls out (but would be only NA in the beginning).
Currently they are upgrading to HW3 just a few cars - as and when they service them for some other reason. I expect them to take up actual HW3 upgrade program in Q1.
Too short, no need to go TSLAQ on usAgreed. In short, no S&P immediately after Q4.
That would satisfy the 'GAAP positive over 4 quarters' guideline but the 'latest quarter be profitable' guideline may yet be violated. It will be interesting to see if Tesla decides to play the S&P inclusion game.However, Q1 2020 + Q4 only needs to be 239 million combined. The Q3 '19, Q3 '18 (311) and Q4 (139) '18 profit levels are all sufficient to achieve that. Any improvement (or tie) in sales over last quarter should be sufficient.
That would satisfy the 'GAAP positive over 4 quarters' guideline but the 'latest quarter be profitable' guideline may yet be violated. It will be interesting to see if Tesla decides to play the S&P inclusion game.
Thanks Mongo.Mathematically, yes that is possible. However, in my opinion, it would take a massive black swam event to make Q1 2020 negative. The oft quoted Elon statement regarding Q1 being tough was in reference to QoQ delivery increases, not profitability. GF3 + increasing backlog + $500 increase in TM3 price + FSD feature increases + Fiat Credit pool bode well for positive earnings.
Thanks Mongo.
I was paraphrasing your comments from the other thread. Sorry about the late attribution.
Does Tesla have any large loan services to make in Q1 ?
Mathematically, yes that is possible. However, in my opinion, it would take a massive black swam event to make Q1 2020 negative. The oft quoted Elon statement regarding Q1 being tough was in reference to QoQ delivery increases, not profitability. GF3 + increasing backlog + $500 increase in TM3 price + FSD feature increases + Fiat Credit pool bode well for positive earnings.
Dave T talks a lot about MY here which I hope won't have a positive impact on S&P inclusion because the expectation here (most people I think) is that the Q1 earnings will be sufficient. GF3 will help a little.
Video from Dave Lee about why he thinks Tesla could be added to S&P500 in 2020
Tesla will likely drop prices again for US customers to compensate for the loss of the final increment in the great US-EV-tax-credit ziggurat.Does anyone think Tesla will drop prices a little, early in Q1 to guarantee seasonality does not impact demand? If they wait until later in the quarter they have to drop prices by more which will affect future quarters (assuming they have to drop prices at all).