TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
Start a Discussionhttps://teslamotorsclub.com/tmc/tags/

Short range battery software locked?

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by cyber3, Oct 11, 2017.

  1. cyber3

    cyber3 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Nj
    Hey folks, I was just wondering if you guys thought the short range battery on the model 3 would be physically limited to 50 KWh or would it be limited using software like the Model S 60 was. Just wondering with the production delays whether Tesla would default the battery size on all 3s and have glass roof on all cars regardless to speed things up.
     
  2. run-the-joules

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2017
    Messages:
    236
    Location:
    SF Bay
    It's a physical difference unless they're including a fat guy to explain the weight difference between models.
     
    • Like x 2
    • Funny x 2
    • Helpful x 1
    • Informative x 1
  3. PoitNarf

    PoitNarf Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2016
    Messages:
    44
    Location:
    NJ
    As stated, the curb weights for both the standard and long range have been released by Tesla. No software locked battery on the standard. And having a default battery size and glass roof is already the case with the initial production. All cars built now all have the long range battery and premium upgrade package, so it’s as streamlined as possible when it comes to options.
     
    • Helpful x 1
  4. Troy

    Troy Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,113
    Location:
    Hi. The Electrek article here says the large pack has 4,416 cells and the small one has 2,976 cells. Therefore the answer is no, the small back is not a software limited version of the large pack. Also, the small pack is 55 kWh, not 50 and the large pack is 80 kWh, not 75.

    Model 3 80
    Actual capacity: 80.5 kWh (350V*230Ah= 80,500 Wh. Source for 350V and 230 Ah, see page 3 here)
    Usable capacity: 78.27 kWh (Source: see page 6 footer here)
    Cell count: 4,416 (source)

    Model 3 55
    Actual capacity: 54.25 kWh (This is an estimate calculated from cell counts: 80,500/4416*2976= 54,250 Wh)
    Usable capacity: 52.75 kWh (This is an estimate calculated from cell counts: 78,270/4416*2976= 52,747 Wh)
    Cell count: 2,976 (source)
     
    • Informative x 2
  5. brkaus

    brkaus Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2014
    Messages:
    2,092
    No
     
  6. jtpassat

    jtpassat Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2015
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    Providence, RI
  7. Pkmmte

    Pkmmte New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2017
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    California
  8. FlyingKiwi

    FlyingKiwi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2017
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    Auckland, NZ
    I think we have enough people posting "no" already, perhaps we could stop posting in this thread and let it sink to the bottom mmkay?
     
    • Like x 1
  9. dsvick

    dsvick Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2016
    Messages:
    1,384
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    No ;)
     
    • Funny x 1
  10. BluestarE3

    BluestarE3 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Messages:
    2,652
    Location:
    Norcal
    That's what all those additional "No"s are for... to ensure there's enough weight to sink this thread. You don't want it inadvertently floating back to the surface later because we were too stingy with the ballast. :)
     
    • Funny x 2

Share This Page