Good find ZenMan. As it happens, it occurred to me just earlier today there might be a pretty large but hidden motive behind GM's decision to do the Bolt... protecting their truck business. For GM and Ford (and I presume Chrysler) trucks have been cited as being the lion's share of profits (Adam Jonas has even suggested 90%, but that's Adam Jonas, so take it with a grain of salt). Perhaps the folks in Detroit aren't so much thinking 10K or 20K annual Bolt volumes are going to change their bottom line (that's all the battery supply they have at this point), but, building several years of experience and market credibility with long range electric drivetrains could appeal to them as offering a far better capacity to defend their truck market share with their own BEV trucks in the timeframe a Tesla truck comes out, rather than practically starting from scratch with BEVs at that point. This bit about how much the X can tow vs. a big truck, highlights the greater possibilities of what a dedicated BEV truck could offer. The fact that Ford, who also makes their bread and butter with trucks, is reported to have jumped in to do a direct Bolt competitor is consistent with this theory about the role trucks may be playing in these incumbents going after BEVs... Ford has far more reason to be concerned about GM doing a BEV truck in the early 2020s, than selling a few Bolts in the next few years. fwiw, Elon has more than once suggested a truck would be the next big vehicle platform to follow the Model 3. It's not a commitment, and an all new Roadster might come first, but it's been suggested a truck is on deck. Just something to think about as we currently read about GM or Ford long range BEV plans.