racer26
Active Member
Argh. Of course all this good news comes out right after my Oct 7 calls expired worthless.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't believe that those are just as plausible. And the reason is that Elon continues to play the long game, and the most important thing currently to succeeding in the long game is the Model 3 ramp. So if Tesla needed additional capital in Q4 to stay on the accelerated ramp for the Model 3, Elon would raise it at $200 or $190 and take the extra dilution vs. a $230 price. Elon does not optimize for the short term, and he has proven that to us many times recently. Remember how the announcements of 500K vehicles in 2018 and the SolarCity acquisition tanked the stock? Both short term hits because of Elon executing on his long term vision.
Happy Birthday!I bought two more Nov calls on Friday and today is literally my birthday. Was a very good birthday unrelated to TSLA, but signing on and getting the news has been the icing on the cake.
They stopped production for the first week in October...
Him reminding us that a SEC filing two days earlier contradicts Elon Musks tweet is very sober, useful and material information...
virtually all of the articles on the subject of the tweets have references to the discrepancy between Elon's statements and the SEC filing. regardless of your opinion... it is part of the conversation and therefore useful material to the subject. i'm taken back at the blinders many are wearing on this board. why would *any* information directly related to the subject be so immediately dismissed?Actually, a lot can happen and change in two days especially when Tesla is the subject. There are literally hundreds of examples of Tesla making changes out of the blue/over night on this board. So no, not sober, not necessarily useful or material. What's sober, useful and material is what was most recently tweeted because that's where Tesla is now in this moment.
...why would *any* information directly related to the subject be so immediately dismissed?
virtually all of the articles on the subject of the tweets have references to the discrepancy between Elon's statements and the SEC filing. regardless of your opinion... it is part of the conversation and therefore useful material to the subject. i'm taken back at the blinders many are wearing on this board. why would *any* information directly related to the subject be so immediately dismissed?
I used Oncor as an example because they had a plan to buy 5GW / 15GWh of stationary storage which independent study concluded would be benefitial at $350/kWh. The reason for this large project is that wind accounts for about 15% of Texas' installed generation capacity. This large percentage of renewables put significant strain on the grid, could lead to power interruptions, and results in wind generators at times switching of generation because grid is not able to absorb it.
I do not know how likely agreement with Oncor specifically is, but an offtake agreement is a plausible way to obtain cash Tesla needs to avoid the capital raise.
There are, however, few interesting points to keep in mind regarding the Oncor:
- According to the article linked by @doggusfluffy, although Oncor's parent company is in bankruptcy, Oncor continues operate and is profitable: "Oncor was not part of the bankruptcy and in fact has continued to turn a significant profit."
- There is an intersting connection between Oncor and NextEra Energy, which per @pGo is rumored to pursue agreement with Tesla: on July 29, 2016 Next Era reached definitive agreement to acquire Energy Future Holding's interest in ONCOR Electric Delivery Company.
- Since the definitive agreement above, as of Sept.19 2016 Next Era has boosted its offer for Oncor by $300 million and won court aproval for the acquisition.
- The deal also needs approval by the PUC
i can't wait to find out in about 8 hours how TSLA trades in premarket in AM
i suspect we will have a major UP day tomorrow
i need it since I'm facing a margin call on my TSLA stock due this Friday with all the shenanigans pulled off by GS and shorts last week
i mean it's not a huge deal even if i have to sell a 1000 shares by Friday to meet the margin call since i still have a big position in TSLA but it sure would be nice to see shorts/bears get their comeuppance
seems to me Elon's tweets today should get off a furious rally tomorrow
i can't wait to find out
Better yet learn lesson and avoid marginConsider using Margin Calculator to see if you can buy OTM puts to reduce you margin exposure and eliminate the Margin Call. Depending on your position buying far OTM puts can be all that is required to satisfy the margin call, especially if there is expectation of SP moving up. I've been there and done so on many occasions - it could really help for a very nominal amount spent on the puts.
We expect:Powerwall 2.0?
Or the cargo van based on Model X chassis he recently mentioned.As unlikely as this is, I would give about 40% to this (50% is AP2 and 10% is sg else). Others have noted this could be related to the Model X 60 disappearing - making room for Y - and that a few hundered million in reservations could help with the cash sans the capital raise. Also, it may not be that far fetched to assume that they have 1 early prototype of Y ready to show off.
Better yet learn lesson and avoid margin
Wow. Some people are saying "Why build now... they have two years", as if you can build an entire production line in a few days/months. And here you say "There's not enough time to build a warehouse!". Half of Fremont is currently storing either parts or incomplete inventory, and all they need to do is move it all somewhere else, and they can start building a production line.The presentation from the city to the city council suggests the build-out is mainly warehouse space in order to meet the 500k production goal. Given the timing -- is there enough time to do the build-out before 2018? -- I do wonder whether we should take that at face value, however.