ohh, come on ... it was right there, you were one letter away, I can't believe you didn't see it ....
Joke #1: Too little coffee... too latte...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ohh, come on ... it was right there, you were one letter away, I can't believe you didn't see it ....
Regarding the Tesla (looks like a Model S, to me) crash in Los Gatos, Tesla Crashes Into Los Gatos Starbucks says
"The driver is cooperating with a police investigation, she says she thought her car was in park and she does not know what happened."
I love thinking funny stuff. Not knowing how/if possible, but couldn't the hack just replace the information coming from the pedal sensors, so any traces/logs would be saved looking like the person was pressing the pedal.
If you have physical access then anything is possible...Bingo! Don't need to reverse engineer and rewrite logging files, when it's easier to spoof sensors -- the logs get written correctly for you.
The bonus of spoofing inputs is actually getting the car to do things when it can't discern the physical input as being provided by a person or not... Sure, the car will try to use all available inputs in deducing truth: there might be other necessary conditions, with corresponding sensors...to cross-check. But spoofing a series of inputs, like simulate weight on drivers seat, etc... will get an effect to happen.
Spoofing an input can be done with a physical "fake" of the external stimulus like that. But maybe also spoofed electronically by inserting a "man in the middle" attack... taps the sensor wires and mess with the values.
Examining the sensor and see what it would take to spoof it. Some important sensors have internal redundancies... drive by wire cars have been around for years. Often, sensors are very simple and simple to spoof, but can contain little complexities to be aware of. Such as there's two potentiometers in the accelerator pedal sensor - ingeniously arranged to swipe in tandem but in opposite directions. Therefore, as one value increases the other must decrease at a correspondingly predictable value to be considered a valid input.. any "funny" stuff from one of them and the car determines the pedal is bad, ignores it. Assumes a poor electrical connection.
But you could build a little electronic thing that emulates the sensor. Injects legit values on the wire that are electrically compatible with the CPU trying to read it. Once you understand a sensor's design and output you can emulate it. On little sensors there's no intelligence or crypto key protections... it's just raw electrical signaling.
So Jason would have to chuck a brick on the seat as well as jamb a stick to the pedal to get the Tesla to do an unmanned drag race. Or get creative with sensors.
If you have physical access then anything is possible...
In the surprise/shock/confusion of the moment she remembers the events differently than they really occurred.
Forget about having a sound emitter OUTSIDE the car for the benefit of blind pedestrians.... seems like a sound emitter is needed INSIDE the car so driver knows the car is "running" (not in Park).
Joke #2: Espresso lane
This particular wreck feels like Deja Brew.ohh, come on ... it was right there, you were one letter away, I can't believe you didn't see it ....
Joke #1: Too little coffee... too latte...
Operative 2 words; Chill modeThis is what happens when you have a car that goes full speed too fast for most people to handle.
And this is definitely a key point that keeps getting ignored.
The cars have a lot of torque available, and on my bench I actually use the hydraulic brakes as a dummy load when testing motors. However, if the motor isn't moving, it can not break free of a solid brake press. Heck, even the puny pads of the parking brake make it almost impossible for it to break free. The performance motors can break free of the parking brake with extreme difficulty, but not the hydraulic brakes. It just sits there and struggles until the motor throws an error and gives up (few seconds).
Here's a (private) video clip I made a while back of a small rear Model S drive unit on my bench (pretty similar specs to the 3 drive units) trying to break free of just the parking brake, which has wayyyy less force than the hydraulic brakes.
Ramped to full throttle at least once in there, zero wheel movement.
So yeah, sorry... no one's foot was on the brake pedal while the car was quickly accelerating. Just not possible. The accelerator pedal was pressed. User error.
I wish folks would just get over it and move on... but, the internet.
Seems like the Tesla should do this automatically... Change regen to low if temperature below a certain threshold, warn the user, and they can override it on the screen by selecting to turn it back to high. Tweet Elon with this safety recommendation, see what he says!Best recommendation someone had for me was put regen braking in 'low' mode when faced with slippery surfaces
Maybe Jaguar wasn't being so stupid adding fake engine noises to the I-Pace.Excellent idea - how about a big block Chevy sound so that a driver can aurally tell the speed of the electric motor when parking. This would definitely reduce pedal misapplication. Heck make it configurable to so that a user can choose what kind of sound they like - Ferrari, Muscle car, F1 car etc.
I want to make sure I am understanding your position.
1. Tesla computer malfunctioned and and initiated SUA.
2. Tesla hydraulic brakes malfunctioned and did not slow down the vehicle, but acted as the accelerator, due to computer overriding hydraulic brakes.
3. Tesla needs to drop everything that they are doing so they can prove to you it wasn’t the above issues.
4. NHTSA is going to cover up the facts because they are sick and tired of people complaining about SUA.
5. You refuse to believe operator error happened because, although it happens thousands of times a year, In all types of vehicles, and you weren’t in vehicle when it happened, you would rather believe numbers 1-4 above.
If the above 5 are correct can you please answer who was shooting from the grassy knoll?
Funny. It crossed my mind that Tesla should bring you in as an independent subject matter expert - and also get testimony that you already told the plaintiff that it was not possible, but they went ahead with the suit anyway. And then Tesla can attempt to reclaim their costs defending a frivolous suit.
And this is definitely a key point that keeps getting ignored. Here's a (private) video clip I made a while back of a small rear Model S drive unit on my bench (pretty similar specs to the 3 drive units) trying to break free of just the parking brake, which has wayyyy less force than the hydraulic brakes. Ramped to full throttle at least once in there, zero wheel movement.
So yeah, sorry... no one's foot was on the brake pedal while the car was quickly accelerating. Just not possible. The accelerator pedal was pressed. User error.
I wish folks would just get over it and move on... but, the internet.