Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Supercharger - Wilsonville, OR (LIVE 17 Nov 2023, 8 V4 stalls)

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
DC Fact Chargers (aka super chargers) don't use onboard chargers.

That was probably one of us with older cars back when they offered them with the dual onboard ac chargers. (72A in my case.)
No, it was a 2023 Model Y. It was in one of these V4 threads. The line item for the charger mentioned 300kw capabilities.

The vehicles they chose were quite diverse. One appeared to be a 2017 Model X from my eye. Not sure what that would provide them if they were testing V4 capabilities.
If they were testing 300kw, they were probably just testing the power sharing capabilities between cabinets if one of the newer vehicles was drawing 300kw. But they’d need a 1000kw generator to test at full load and that one doesn’t appear to be that big so who knows what type of testing they are doing.
 
Someone mentioned having their vin decoded for options and a line item indicated the onboard charger was capable of 300kw.

That was probably one of us with older cars back when they offered them with the dual onboard ac chargers. (72A in my case.)

Both statements slightly incorrect.
On-board charger wasn't/will not ever have that much power to charge
What it does have is a bypass route (relay n buses) to feed DC charge straight to the battery and that needs to handle the current of 300kw
But also all the wires need to handle 300kw..
So, more correct would be to say "wiring capable of 300kw"

72a was just a beefier AC charger (technically any ac charger converts to DC, but u get the point)
We're talking about DC coming from the plug directly to battery so on-board charger is bypassed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cabbey
Both statements slightly incorrect.
On-board charger wasn't/will not ever have that much power to charge
What it does have is a bypass route (relay n buses) to feed DC charge straight to the battery and that needs to handle the current of 300kw
But also all the wires need to handle 300kw..
So, more correct would be to say "wiring capable of 300kw"

72a was just a beefier AC charger (technically any ac charger converts to DC, but u get the point)
We're talking about DC coming from the plug directly to battery so on-board charger is bypassed.
If you click the link I posted, that’s exactly what it says. I apologize for not copying and pasting instead of just linking in my earlier post.

"CH16 Charger 48 Amp PCS1 Charger Hardware (RENA) w/ Busbar improvements allowing 300kW charging"

And unless you mean dual chargers as was posted before, it (72A) was not a “beefier” AC charger. It was literally 2 separate 32A chargers.
 
So this morning testing signs were up and fences in place. Just drove by now and fences are loaded up and getting hauled away. Also, no sign of testing signs
IMG_1373.jpeg
 
Moderator note: This thread plus a couple follow-ups were merged in from a different thread.

I was able to plug in for a photo op but nothing happens as far as charging activity. Does anyone here know when they go live?
 

Attachments

  • 20231027_083721.jpg
    20231027_083721.jpg
    477.4 KB · Views: 60
Last edited by a moderator:
Some more details. Note the difference between the 500V and 1000V NACS plugs. The 1000V version doesn't have the center pins the in DC holes.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20231105_002816436.jpg
    PXL_20231105_002816436.jpg
    603.2 KB · Views: 38
  • PXL_20231105_002912097.jpg
    PXL_20231105_002912097.jpg
    327 KB · Views: 36
  • PXL_20231105_003025515.jpg
    PXL_20231105_003025515.jpg
    857.4 KB · Views: 28
  • PXL_20231105_003113775.jpg
    PXL_20231105_003113775.jpg
    408.9 KB · Views: 36
  • PXL_20231105_002708946.jpg
    PXL_20231105_002708946.jpg
    527.4 KB · Views: 40