TaoJones
Beyond Driven
Well, I thought I'd chime in because I hadn't seen any posts for people without access to home charging who got the letter. I don't have home charging, and am a frequent user of Superchargers. I would love to get home charging as it would nearly eliminate the need to go to Superchargers, but that's not possible. When I buy my next house I will certainly install home charging, and it will be awesome! I usually visit superchargers at off-peak times -- often I am the only one charging so I don't think I am contributing to congestion. I have never left my car plugged in after I have finished charging, and usually leave when my charge is <70% so I stay in the faster portion of the charge curve.
I use public J1772 and CHAdeMO charging whenever it is available (which, unfortunately is not often -- the near perfect reliability of Superchargers puts other public charging infrastructure to shame). The Blink CHAdeMO chargers near my apartment have >50% downtime. The Nissan CHAdeMOs overheat more reliably than they charge my car. Even with it's problems, the CHAdeMo adapter is a wonderful addition to my car, and makes ownership without home charging much easier than relying solely on public J1772.
I think Tesla needs to do a better job of Supercharger use education, and this letter was a (poor) attempt at that -- many new owners are not technically-minded early-adopters knowledgeable about pedestal pairing, charge taper curves/charging more than they need, and leaving their cars blocking chargers after they have finished charging. Tesla does almost no education about public charging in their sales/delivery process, and that probably contributes to Supercharger congestion. It is somewhat disconcerting to get a letter asking me to reduce my supercharger usage when Tesla has told me that using superchargers is perfectly acceptable in my situation.
Very well said.
As I've noted, the non-garaged Model S owners are not the problem - not to mention they've been told by Tesla that they can use SCs without worry. The problems include ICEing by other owners, livery to an extent, and the absurd witch hunt for the "daily-charging local" who by and large does not exist. Much like crowding at SoCal SCs, it's a construct invented and perpetuated mostly by people who neither use SCs nor live in SoCal to begin with.
Finally, using the fear of the Model 3 as justification to persecute the no -garaged is equally absurd; a mass market car won't even *have* SC capability in the default model. As noted either here or at TM, the first Mustangs didn't even come with radios. Why? Mass market price point appeal.
But by all means, let the handwringing busybody contingent continue the kvetchfest.
Meanwhile, there appears to be an opportunity for clarification and welcome improvement on the part of Tesla. Owners and investors are waiting - to say nothing of prospective customers.