The cost of making Teslas in China goes down over time due to a range of reasons
- Efficiencies that Tesla and their suppliers introduce in a way that no other car company can do - multiple improvements every day, trialled on a few cars, tracked via digital twin, homologated via twin & rolled out if successful (Agile Hardware). [Joe Justice, Munro Associates for more info]
- Cheaper battery prices - as low as $57 per kWh for automotive LFP have been reported at cell level. CATL supplied whole Tesla LFP packs saving Tesla money, time and space. I'm not sure who is currently supplying Tesla LFP and in what proportion in each location. I believe that both CATL and BYD have been or are suppliers. LFP is 50% (maybe more) of Teslas now [Jeff Lutz]
- Non Tesla car companies have collapsed their orders leading to Tesla being regarded as a tough but fair customer - most importantly dependable. Tesla can utilise this [Jeff Lutz]
- Deflation in Chinese factory output prices for many companies including Tesla View attachment 1053237
Tesla are winning in China and have the knowledge, tools, products and
preparation to withstand any wave of Chinese imports. BYD Seal & Tesla prices not much different. Teslas are competitive (in my opinion) in all their main markets.
Much of this applies to other Tesla manufacturing hubs such as Berlin.
This has resulted in
10% price cuts for Teslas in some markets such as
Norway (and Australia I believe) while using
subsidised interest rates in others. Subsidised interest rates tend to work better in markets that use debt to buy cars, cash reduction better in other markets. In the UK, subsidised interest rates have less effect on second-hand prices and there's a huge supply of Model Ys coming up on the secondary market from leases ending. Luckily demand for second-hand Teslas is up hugely - but I could see Tesla UK preferring lower interest rates for the moment.
What does this mean for the future? Tesla will stay competitive, dominating EV market pricing in their key markets. EV prices will continue to fall while those who understand Total Cost of Ownership and that EVs are better vehicles will buy EVs again. Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) economics fails as suppliers are squeezed from lower prices from desperate ICE car makers and lower volumes. Plant can't be used optimally, Headquarters and other overhead costs become supplier-killing.
The
title of this thread has been debunked in my opinion. For those keeping an open mind, I'd suggest weighing up info in the thread versus headlines that often don't match articles (writers don't choose headlines). Headlines are often chosen by others for clickbait - indeed there are often different headlines that are tested and the most negative often wins due to human nature. This process is now automated or aided by Artificial Intelligence (AI) - so
- Headlines often don't match article
- Article often doesn't match data
- Multiple fear-related headlines are pumped out for the less discerning to be caught out by
- Most effective (often most inaccurate) headline wins.