...
Lastly, I was often in Detroit when 08 blew up, we (as in my small partnership where I was lead partner) lost over 10 mil in contracts in 08/9 in Detroit. Don't rewrite history yourself. Ford would have loved for GM to fail, they were F'ing furious at the govt bailing GM out... Ford is also to be commended for that foresight, they saved US taxpayers billions and billions.
This is an excellent summary o events. I would add that GM blew up mostly because of their absurd dive in sub-prime mortgages. GMAC consultants recommended they "..make a small invement in mortgage services to GM dealers, employees, suppliers and customers". The basis for the recommendation is that they already had much of the risk for suppliers, dealers and employees so they could reduce credit risk and simplify processing administration. GMAC responded by buying Nationwide. The linked article covers ONLY the UK, and ONLY part of that:
FSA orders sub-prime lender GMAC-RFC to pay £7.7m in compensation for mistreating customers who fell into arrears
www.theguardian.com
The moral is to do what you know about, and don't imagine you can do all things to all people. Had GM stayed to it's competence they might have problems but much milder. GM chose finance people to lead the company, ones who knew very little about autos and trucks, even less about diesel engines and locomotives.
Ford at the time chose a conservative financial posture, even exiting some financial businesses. They were mostly unscathed.
For the record, statute for limitations long gone: I led the project for GMAC to which I referred. I did a similar project for Ford at about the same time. Neither was at all concerned that we were doing almost the same project for both. Ford was cautious. GM was brazen.
However this was a global disaster, driven by a large number fo industry leaders who were greedy and ignorant of risks, so adopted a long succession of indefensible moves, IN RETROSPECT! (sorry for screaming, but anybody who ever thinks that prosperity can long endure has ignored world history. Similar indefeasible moves led to the Weimar Republic and all that followed. They also led to the US apparent sudden disenchantment with [we all know].
As
@nativewolf implies, superficiality leads to bad outcomes. FWIW, he and I disagree on much, but not on this.
This is relevant to TSLA quite specifically. When some of us dream that Tesla will grow endlessly at high levels to take over automotive and renewable energy, just remember that that will NOT happen. Others welcome along to take major share of markets. Tesla will not ever have a monopoly, but they can thrive with lots fo competition. Why: Elon Musk tries to deal with First Principles. Doing so allows Tesla to grow rapidly and mitigate many problems. That does not make Tesla invincible.
As so many have said, in Edmund Burke's words: "“Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it.”
So long as Tesla, SpaceX. etc (i.e. Elon Musk) does not become arrogant major success will ensue. The day hubris appears disaster will soon follow.
We all need to be very careful lest we lose all that we have gained. We do need to understand history.