My best estimate after watching Tesla’s corporate behavior over the last 12 years is that they will not recognize FSD revenue in Q3 or Q4. I think it’s more likely to be Q1 or Q2, when FSD may be reasonably safe enough to release to the masses even without a driver safety review.
This also would line up with traditionally lower demand quarters to supplement revenue, although with demand so high now that doesn’t appear like it will be a factor.
I'm not so sure about that. Remember what happened with Tesla's rollout of the core FSD feature "
Smart Summon"? This is what Elon tweeted on Oct 11, 2019:
Elon Musk on Twitter: "Now that Tesla V10.0 with Smart Summon is out, Full Self-Driving price will increase by $1000 on Nov 1"
That software was good enough to satisfy the feature set requirement, and Tesla started booking the revenue for that portion of FSD on the next quarterly income statement (they also booked the deferred revenue for that feature).
Now most people (including Elon) would say the feature wasn't very capable at that time, but it had a non-zero chance of working. That was (and likely still is) the accounting standard for "
feature complete", not that it's perfect or even really good. Obviously, with the 3-D vector virtual world that FSD v10 now drives in, Smart Summon (and everything else done by FSD) is getting better. But that IS NOT how the Accountants book the revenue, which is simple by the "
feature complete" standard.
So I expect Tesla will book the balance of FSD revenue for "
Navigate on City Streets" as soon as it meets the Accounting standards for a software deliverable, not any subjective quality of use standard.
Cheers!
P.S. Elon talked about what he means by "
feature complete" on Feb 19, 2019 on the ARK podcast:
On the Road to Full Autonomy With Elon Musk — FYI Podcast
Elon added the caveat that FSD would not '
work perfectly' and it would require supervision. There has been plenty of discussion about what "
feature complete" means here at TMC