Looks like the next attempt at the summit is getting ready.
Mt. 900 will be topped!
900 is Adam Jonas price target. If they do listen internally to him, they would be selling ...
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like the next attempt at the summit is getting ready.
Mt. 900 will be topped!
Except 100% of features of both EAP and AP are fully delivered and have been for over 2 years. 100% of that revenue was long since recognized.
So that reading makes no sense at all.
Only if FSD has different feature sets based on purchase date does his remarks about purchase date impacting which features a buyer is owed make sense.
For post 3/19 buyers all promised features at time of sale are fully delivered today other than city streets, which as we know is in limited beta right now. Once that goes wide, 100% of revenue to those buyers can be recognized.
But they will not be able to fully recognize remaining deferred revenues of pre 3/19 buyers, since they bought a different set of features that would not be fully delivered by just a wide rollout of L2 city streets.
And since Teslas own website literally calls out that that is true, and was pretty clearly the intent of why the product description was significantly changed back in march 2019 (and this change was widely discussed as such here) it's weird anyone is still resistant to believe it.
bitcoin?I'm tired of the self-congratulatory pitter patter (and frankly, it makes me nervous when exuberance replaces analysis) so for something else NOT TSLA but somewhat related, I invite you all to play NAME THAT STOCK
And don't even try to get cute. You would have to know the currency
View attachment 723994
bitcoin?
Interesting guess, but I think bitcoin is much more volatile. Next guess ?
AMD, NVIDIA and many more biotechs - I suggest we let this rest - not as big a deal at TSLA because of its market cap/ importanceInteresting guess, but I think bitcoin is much more volatile. Next guess ?
This discussion really belongs elsewhere because it gets pretty detailed
Tesla has to make accounting decisions as to how much of the purchased value has been delivered at the end of each quarter for each car depending upon when certain features were purchased and the pricing of those features. Because AP and EAP and FSD have been sold at various times and in various combinations for various prices, the calculation for each car is different and varies upon what features were promised at the time of sale, what percent of the value was already present in the car at the time of purchase. And the price varied.
For example, my wife's car was purchased in early 2018 with AP but not FSD.
Not all promised autopilot features were activated yet. At a later date she added FSD for $3,500. My car was purchased with Extended AP and not all features were active yet (summon, etc). At a later date, Tesla lowered the price on FSD and I added it to the package. And, over the course of selling those features, increasing numbers of them became active.
The point is, the accounting for these features is dependent upon what was active when the user purchased them and what was yet to be delivered.
In other words, the price the customer paid must be divided up based upon what was available at the time and what was promised (and even when it was promised because the time value of money might play into this). And the calculation will be different for different customers
. I'm just saying that Zach's comment that the revenues must be accounted for based upon what the customer was promised (and what was already delivered) is not proof that Tesla is accounting for two different versions FSD sold.
In fact, your interpretation implies Tesla should be refunding a portion of early FSD sales
. Because your scenario implies Tesla is admitting they sold something they don't intend to deliver.
Or that early FSD purchasers will be getting something that later FSD purchasers will not. So, no, your arguments do not sway me.
Tesla is enforcing strict FSD Beta rules for inattentive drivers
It appears that Tesla is indeed determined to keep its FSD Beta program as free from untoward incidents as possible. As recently shared by the Tesla community online, Tesla has been sending out emails to some FSD Beta testers who have been flagged for not using the advanced driver assist system...www.teslarati.com
Hello Missy,
You are receiving this email because telemetry from your vehicle was flagged for improper usage of the FSD Beta feature.
Specifically, while using the FSD Beta feature, you or another driver of your vehicle received:
This is your only warning to please keep your hands on the wheel and remain attentive at all times when using Autopilot. The car is not autonomous, and if you aren’t paying attention, a crash could happen, and you or others could get hurt, or worse, so failure to abide by this warning will result in removal of the FSD Beta feature from your vehicle.
- Two or more “strikeouts,” which resulted in the loss of Autopilot availability for that drive; or
- At least one “strike” per 5 km (about 3 miles) driven on Autopilot, which is a visual and audible warning that requires attention.
The Tesla Team
This could be the new high on the Street (Pierre is with New Street Research):
what is it?I'm tired of the self-congratulatory pitter patter (and frankly, it makes me nervous when exuberance replaces analysis) so for something else NOT TSLA but somewhat related, I invite you all to play NAME THAT STOCK
And don't even try to get cute. You would have to know the currency
View attachment 723994