This would be fantastic, I could care less how Elon spends his $$ but I would hate to see this purchase necessitate any further Tsla sales.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
Additionally they could issue a "dividend" in the form of dogecoin to be used toward Tesla purchases at some point down the line.
First rivian sighting in Central FL! However its on a tow truck....
Nearest service station looks to be in Houston Texas so I have no idea where it's being towed to...maybe port Canaveral? Like I said, you must be out of your mind to buy from these newcomers without that infrastructure.
Nearest service station looks to be in Houston Texas so I have no idea where it's being towed to...maybe port Canaveral? Like I said, you must be out of your mind to buy from these newcomers without that infrastructure.
Attachments
TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
At what point do all these "typos" start to look more like a revenue stream? Reuters today.....
That's strange. I don't even remember us printing $3+ per share in 2Q21!
I must be getting loopy in my old age. Financial analysts and world class business journalists are rarely wrong.
That's strange. I don't even remember us printing $3+ per share in 2Q21!
I must be getting loopy in my old age. Financial analysts and world class business journalists are rarely wrong.
Google says 2q2021 eps was $1.45
Everyone ready for Netflix......the all mighty bellwether for how well the entire economy is doing.......to tank the stock market????
.............
.............
Last edited:
More important-they have to pay 99% of the lawyer's fee-I assume. In liability cases, don't lawyers typically work on a contingency where they get 1/3 (or some percentage) of the settlement? Seems like the family and the lawyers were greedy and going after Tesla's "deep pockets", and now they are determined primarily responsible. After they already knew their child wasn't driving responsibly and yet allowed him to use the car again. Would be interesting if the family is forced to pony up 1/3 (-1%) of the lawyer's fees. Might take away some of the greed of those considering such suits. Unlikely, but one can hope.
As Canadian, my brokerage accounts (both TD Direct Investing as well as Wealthsimple Trade) are not supported to connect to Say. I have manually submitted my broakerage statement for share holder manual review process. All it was asking me to enter is number of shares and upload a statement in PDF format.
I think they are saying that, a year ago, Q2's estimated EPS was $3.21, and $1.86 is 58% (42% slump) of that.
dhanson865
Well-Known Member
saying you couldn't care less is inaccurate. If you didn't care that much you wouldn't bother to say a word or type about it.
I could care less, but if I cared much less I wouldn't have written this post.
Last edited:
At this rate of improvement, I reckon GLJ will reach a reasonable price target by 2030-ish...
That was a careless mistake.
This "consumer group" got the CO2 impact totally backwards.another lawsuit, this time in Berlin by German "consumer group" vzbv
alleges Tesla:
- untruthful about CO2 impact as it sells carbon credits to other manufacturers allowing them to pollute
- does not tell buyers they must comply with European data regulations when using Sentry mode
CO2 claim is odd, as in reality all it does is pay Tesla rather than face government fines, credits do not increase/decrease CO2 just adjust the direction and amount of fines.
data regs should be easily dealt with in the small print I would guess.
If Tesla does not sell carbon credits, then the polluters would have to pay fines to the government instead.
So the question is: who is more effective in using the money to reduce CO2 emissions and transition the world to sustainable energy use ?
And the answer is obvious: Tesla is far more effective!
Knightshade
Well-Known Member
Point of order-- not that these lawsuits aren't silly... but aren't the fines GREATER than the cost of buying the credits?
(if they weren't, they'd just pay the fines, instead of giving $ to a competitor after all).
Since that's the case, one could argue a cheaper option to remain in violation (buying credits instead of paying fines) slows them down in getting out of violation.
This may well be to Teslas benefit economically on many levels- but not necessarily to the mission.
I agree that it's nice to eliminate mold changes-as a former manufacturing engineer, it's always easier to run one part/mold on a press (die-casting or injection molding machine). But it's rarely practical and I suspect relatively rarely done these days. There is a large capital investment in something the size of a Gigapress, it needs to be run at speed as much as possible to see economical operation. I came across a video showing a mold change using current quick mold change technology. This is far, far ahead of what I'm used to-in "my day" the molds were still screwed in place manually, the cooling/electronic/hydraulic connections done manually, and no pre-heating of the mold before attaching it to the plattens of the machine (since operators had to be working in there.
Not saying Tesla will employ this technique-the throughput of the Gigapress may not be sufficient to get ahead of the assembly line run rate, and the model mix may not require it. Just saying it's a valid option.
It seems awful risky to be posting things like this.
Some may even consider it careless.
Who has the time to read the crap posted on here for longer than a few seconds and, then, backtrack over many years to resurface it again? It's a TSLA fan site, super small inkling of the Internet
"Anything is possible with a Tesla" (new advertising slogan) - Make sure you drive thro' British Columbia/ up the Cassiar Highway. I would take my cargo tray (on tow hitch) with Yamaha Generator to charge up in the Dead Zones.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
