the Netherlands misses the southern half of Germany, and even there the sun shines during winter. In my case, I have only six panels and the worst month still give 40 kWh, I.e. 30% of my monthly consumption. my neighbor has 20 panels so it is not impossible. Once I switch to an electrical heat pump, that equation changes a bit (but then I’m significantly reducing my primary energy use).It won't help in Dec/Jan/Feb which is the pinch months. Of the new renewables only wind helps in those months, plus the old renewables (hydro) and of course nuclear and fossils.
This is the issue that the pro-solar lobby never want to face up to. Wind of course also means big grid transmission links, and big battery storage schemes, in order to provide the requisite despatchibility in those critical winter months.
This is the same issue worldwide in all temeperate locations where humans live.
So .... over-investing in solar is the ultimate wasted investment.
Emotionally good, technically less so.
As it happens, solar and wind ar anticyclical. There is more wind energy in winter. And with well-insulated homes, heat pumps have a little leeway in when they run.
@AukeHoekstra begs to differ with you on the feasibility of 100% to match energy consumption.