Gigapress
Trying to be less wrong
Sunk cost fallacy is not some useless academic theory that I brought up as a mere talking point. It is one of the most important things any investor--and even anyone aspiring to make more rational strategic decisions in general--should know to look out for, and even should actively train their brains to think about differently because it is not the default for human psychology."Sunken Cost Fallacy" - a little out of touch perhaps? Not everyone on this site can contemplate financial theories or debate the best way to manufacture EV vehicles. Some just want to make a better living for themselves (and perhaps at the same time save the planet) by investing in a once in a generation company at a fortuitous point in time. Many of us on this board have $1 mil plus to "laugh off" days like this and harken back to other worse moments in TSLA history. Some, however, may have taken a leap of faith by investing $10,000, $20,000 or $100,000 when the stock price was $1,000 pre recent split. I don't take their financial pain lightly or point to theories I may have learned in grad school as mere talking points.
By the way, we learned about this on literally my first day of economics class in undergrad. It's not an advanced concept; the hard part is actually applying the logic to real-world decisions when your mental heuristics, feelings and social environment want to dictate otherwise.
One of the best ways somebody can sabotage their owns plans to become a millionaire in the first place is to worry about these feelings and rashly act upon them instead of calming down and thinking things through.
Again: How do you specifically define "may not be able to ride out the current environment", and why would that condition be affected by the original purchase price of the investor's TSLA shares?
Last edited: