MC3OZ
Active Member
The Model Y ramp up at Fremont will depend largely upon the continued successful buildout of the Battery Workshop at GF3/Shanghai.
GF3 will be at 3K/wk at some point in 2020H1, and we have strong signs the Fremont is already at 7K/wk. That's 10K packs/wk that have to come from GF1/Sparks. So Model Y will be battery cell constrained in 2020H1 until GF3 can begin their own pack production from locally sourced cells, freeing up those extra 3K packs per week for Model Y at Fremont. Whew, logistics!
Panasonic will (as usual) be under continued pressure to increase cell production throughout 2020. I think the ultimate limiting factor on Model 3/Y output at Fremont is stamping capacity, at about 14K/wk with the existing Schuler press.
That 14K capacity could be allocated as demand requires, ie: 5K Model 3 and 9K Model Y to satisfy initial high demand for Y, and then tilting back toward 3 when GF4 brings more Y capacity online in 2021, and Fremont continues to be the sole source of Model 3 for Europe.
Cheers!
P.S. I think TE needs to build a Gigafactory in Western Australia: Solar, Power-walls/packs and Megapacks. It'll be huge given nascent demand for TE products.
I agree, I was thinking about where Tesla would locate car factories if they were building say 20 Million cars per year, I still can't see them ever building a car factory in Australia.
However an energy storage battery factory makes a lot of sense, for the domestic market, and for export in the nearby Asia pacific region..
Particularly if they can mine most of the raw materials here, and power the processing with renewable energy.
I'm in 100% agreement that lowering the price of embedded energy in product is the best way to obtain meaningful productivity gains, if a factory is highly automated, the cost of raw materials and energy start to become significant... as robots work for the same wages everywhere.
Last edited: