Dana Hull on Twitter
> What’s the carbon impact of everyone flying to LA for the “Cybertruck” reveal
It made me think she does not appreciate the numbers of what the CyberTruck will save in CO2 emissions.
Someone check my rough maths...
F150 does 450g/mile CO2.
Over lifetime of 150000 miles that’s 67.5 tons of CO2 per F150
If CyberTruck manages 1million miles in lifetime it will displace the CO2 from 6.7 standard pickup truck saving 450tons CO2 each over its lifetime.
Let's say Tesla will make 1million pickups a year so every year the CyberTruck will be essentially removing 450 million tons of CO2 which would have otherwise gone into the atmosphere.
Probably need to minus about 10-30?% for CO2 emissions during production and charging of the CyberTruck though, so only about 360 tons saved, and each CyberTruck would have approximately 90? tons CO2 over its lifetime depending on how energy in produced.
Luckily we have Dana Hull to point out how much CO2 the unveil will produce...
(Perhaps there will be a large scale shift to completely renewable energy soon though, which will drop the CO2 emissions per CyberTruck much much lower, and hopefully Tesla does something to completely offset all production CO2 for their vehicles in the not too distant future.)
The planes everyone is flying in on were going anyway.
The incremental increase in fuel burn for a plane that is 97% full instead of 95% is negligible.