Welp. Lord Elon said it. “Dojo for Doge”.
inevitable really. lol
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1363601164344823810?s=21
inevitable really. lol
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1363601164344823810?s=21
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welp. Lord Elon said it. “Dojo for Doge”.
inevitable really. lol
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1363601164344823810?s=21
There you go @Krugerrand...
Maybe dropping the price was the last ditch effort to increase demand for that model, and it didn't work. (I don't think Elon even wanted to make it in the first place because he thinks you need to have 250 miles of range as a minimum.) So making the SR may have just been to keep the "promise" that was made when it was originally announced.
Anyone else watching Hypernominalisation documentary after Elon tweeted that?
Anyone else watching Hypernominalisation documentary after Elon tweeted that?
It's not that simple.
The article starts out be describing how:
1) back in 2008 Lehman Brothers issued a public apology for having a 5-person team issue a 60-page report that turned out to be plagiarized,
2) at about the same time 1 of these team-members (namely Gordon Johnson) left Lehman Brothers to instead work for a much smaller company, and
3) Gordon Johnson had in fact been fired for being responsible for the plagiarism.
The article's author then goes on to explain that after a series of phone conversations with Gordon Johnson, the author came to doubt that the allegation was worth the trouble that Johnson claimed he was consequently having...
So point 3) is disputed by Johnson - and the article's author has retracted their initial conclusion regarding 3), based on this dispute by Johnson.
That's really not much clearing of a name.
Further, points 1) + 2) are _not_ disputed, nor is an alternative explanation given for how or by whom the plagiarized report was produced.
So I think there is every reason to look into whether Gordon Johnson has the legally required credentials to provide investing advice to the public.
Days? I'm going on 5 years of confusion.I don't understand anything that's going on the past few days.
But then why offer the SR in the first place? And even more importantly, why drop the SR price a few days ago knowing that it was on the way out?
Edit: Also note that removing the SR Y goes against what Elon has been saying for months now: Teslas are too expensive and they need to bring the price down.
I'm hoping Waymo, Nvidia and Intel all hit insurmountable obstacles in their path to full autonomy and OEMs all have to go, hat in hand, to Tesla for autonomous services. I want zero bandwidth remaining for anything else, 'cause you know, I don't want to miss ZEV credits down the road.Speaking of Tesla AI, has anyone explored how Tesla's AI tools will cross over into other industries? It seems natural that the vision tools will be useful for a vast array of other technologies.
I am guessing an announcement of a merger between one of his existing SPACs and a very surprising company. I have no idea what that company would be, but just my guess on his meaning.So what's your guess? A bunch of SPAC acquisitions announced this week?