The Model S and X don't look unattractive. But the stupid wedge on the front of the Model 3 is obnoxious at its core, and the cybernottruck is not a result of design but more of engineering. And don't get me wrong it is appealing (not attractive) because it is form (design) following function (engineering). The cybernottruck is the second coming of the Aztek.
This cut and paste from wiki below describes the cybernotatruck to a "T". I especially like the reference to a "kitchen appliance."
Ultimately, the Aztek was criticized for its styling. Mickey Kaus described the Aztek as having "awkwardly empty and square front wheel wells" and a "gratuitous, fierce animalistic snout, which may have been what prompted incoming GM executive Bob Lutz to famously say that many of the company's products looked like 'angry kitchen appliances.'"[8] James Hall, vice-president at AutoPacific Inc[3] ranked the Aztek as one of the ten ugliest cars of all time, Karl Brauer, CEO and editor-in-chief of TotalCarScore.com said the Aztek featured "atrocious proportions"... "looked like a station wagon stretched out by a car bomb."[9]
So yeah, the cybernotatruck looks just like a fridge mated with a station wagon.
And I want one because it is so damn stupid-looking.
Franz is the weakest element of Tesla, and I like it that way. But don't praise the cat just because he's fortunate enough to design tesla.
At least Franz didn’t design a leaf of bolt looking Model 3.
What is your definition of a truck to exclude the CT from that category?
Is has to look similar to a F150?