These kinds of numbers annoy me. Just goes to show some of that TSLA wealth went to some uneducated people =( First post! =)
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Tesla, TSLA & the Investment World: the Perpetual Investors' Roundtable
- Thread starter AudubonB
- Start date
TSLA could reach $100,000 per share tomorrow if that’s what the market decides it’s worth. It could happen with a small fraction of shares changing hands.
I do think he’s a bit untethered, but it’s an interesting thought experiment to consider pie in the sky scenarios if everything goes swimmingly.
Yes, Tesla's market cap is not constrained by the money supply unless all shares are sold simultaneously, which seems unlikely. Or so it seems to this non-economist at this late hour.
Can you explain how this could possibly happen? Let's say retail and big funds cannot sell stock, you can manipulate it however you like. Can you explain how it is done? Would you just get 2 big funds to buy the stock up off each other at increasingly higher prices? Eventually the big funds would run out of money to buy the blocks of stocks.TSLA could reach $100,000 per share tomorrow if that’s what the market decides it’s worth. It could happen with a small fraction of shares changing hands.
I do think he’s a bit untethered, but it’s an interesting thought experiment to consider pie in the sky scenarios if everything goes swimmingly.
Pretty sure multiples compressed to almost nothing at 2.7 trillion dollars worth of net profit. You can't continue to use multiples of 40 because that's assuming a growth rate of 20-25% going forward which means Tesla will be providing electric cars for a newly discovered planet worth of aliens as eventually saturation hits on earth.TSLA could reach $100,000 per share tomorrow if that’s what the market decides it’s worth. It could happen with a small fraction of shares changing hands.
I do think he’s a bit untethered, but it’s an interesting thought experiment to consider pie in the sky scenarios if everything goes swimmingly.
I think the poster means there's an ask for 100k on the market and some clown decides to buy 1/100k of a fraction of tesla shares(by spending a dollar) and call it a day..lol..so there's one dude in the world who think it's worth 100 trillion.
Last edited:
Hah good point there buddy! I think that is definitely what he probably means. Put in the ask, and let the guy bid for it lol.
The problem here I find with even our biggest TSLA bulls is, no one is willing to put their money where their mouth is. Which is also why the stock would never hit 100k a share. These guys posting videos on youtube already own stock. If you asked them to mortgage their home to buy more they would say no because they already own enough shares (Even though 100k a share is their price target, who wants more money right?) And yet they fully expect their neighbor and anyone else who does not own TSLA shares to go out and bid the price up to such an outrageous share price.
RobStark
Well-Known Member
Are you claiming the rear seats have built-in massagers as well? Because people don't usually buy massage seats for their chauffeurs while practicing asceticism themselves.
Yes, it will be an option. Including rear seat cooling/heating.
Because some will be chauffeured and some owner driven.
BTW Lucid Air will have optional executive rear seats that are better than the front seats.
Just saw a guy on FB claiming that he got FSD beta from the last 1000 roll out a few weeks back. Person is from Quebec..so we have FSD beta outside of the US now.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
That calculation is based on Thursday's data. Look again after 7:00 am ET for an update based on Friday's data.
StealthP3D
Well-Known Member
$100K is not Warren's price target, it's his "pie in the sky" scenario. He doesn't say he expects it will hit $100K, he admits there is a huge range of uncertainty and the most likely scenarios are much lower. He doesn't do "price targets".
Also, to those who say there is not enough money in the universe, I will remind you there was not enough money in the universe in 1930 to support current market valuations. The money supply is elastic and there is a thing called inflation.
Let me play devilds advocat for a sec here.
This EQS has software features Tesla can only dream of (Multi-User-Screen Support with spacial audio, Navigation features etc ... ) and yes the Tab S4 is a bummer, but maybe there are reasons for this bad choice like licencing, time-to-market we don't see?
It's not like Tesla ships crap early on sometimes and replaces it with better choices later - I'm looking at my Baolong TPMS, my v0.9 sunroof etc ...
IMHO the real question is not wether Daimler can catch up Tesla or the other way around - the question is scale and profitability - I am looking forward to see if Daimler can earn money on this 107kwh EQS - because if they can't why should they sell EQS over S-Class at all? (I know the answer - they need to go electric in certain markets)
Let me put my German lense on for a sec - we have a group of buyers that want 100k€+ premium EVs to drive fast in comfort on the Autobahn - Tesla has owned this market so far and with all the Model S issues and ongoing lawsuits Tesla is working hard on loosing that niche - this EQS seems to be great for the middle distance Autobahn driver.
Last edited:
Coming from a photography perspective (my main hobby), I can totally see a combination of camera placements and NN to be able to obtain an accurate distance measuring with vision alone: rangefinder
Laser or sonar/radar based distance measuring is still based on the very principle of a rangefinder: ranging. And if one has the computing power to be constantly comparing at least two cameras' visual input of a single labeled subject, it's not hard to compute the actual distance... quite precisely too.
Say if one grabs a manual Leica RF camera, you shift focus until the 2 image planes overlap each other at any visible point in the frame. The point where the overlap occurs is the point in focus and given enough digitalization, that distance can be accurate down to millimeters. So, for anyone doubting that Tesla can solve the distancing problem with only vision, I don't see a technical problem. It's a technology that's been around for centuries.
Laser or sonar/radar based distance measuring is still based on the very principle of a rangefinder: ranging. And if one has the computing power to be constantly comparing at least two cameras' visual input of a single labeled subject, it's not hard to compute the actual distance... quite precisely too.
Say if one grabs a manual Leica RF camera, you shift focus until the 2 image planes overlap each other at any visible point in the frame. The point where the overlap occurs is the point in focus and given enough digitalization, that distance can be accurate down to millimeters. So, for anyone doubting that Tesla can solve the distancing problem with only vision, I don't see a technical problem. It's a technology that's been around for centuries.
I think more EVs and some competition are a good thing.
But companies who makes ICE cars will find their EV offerings need to be better than their ICE cars, because Tesla will be better.
Sometimes a local company better understands what local customers, want. This is one reason why IMO Tesla is being smart opening design centres in China and Germany, they can tap a different perspective and target products better to the local market.
I do think the Plaid+ Model S is going to tick most of the boxes for Autobahn driving, it will certainly be better than earlier versions of Model S.
What people are sometimes overlooking is the significance of Battery Day combined with the Berlin and Austin factory builds, Tesla is poised to scale production rapidly. Daimler will close the gaps on EV technology and software, closing the gap on production volumes, FSD, and fast charging is much harder.
As a non-German, my perspective is VW is doing a good job, and are going to carve out a good EV market share. Daimler has long been recognised for engineering excellence and product reliability. I don't doubt the quality of their products, but I do wonder about market share. I think they will have enough market share to survive, but may end up with significantly less market share than today.
I say this because I think it is a race for EV market share, carving out a large EV market share early, delivers a lot of advantages.
Thank you Audie. I did wonder (privately) about that feature.Mod: There are to be NO comments about that....thingy...in an interesting location in the passenger's seat.
Artful Dodger
"Neko no me"
NASDAQ-100 Futures: -12.62 -0.09% 04:12:25
Apr. 12, 4:10 a.m. EDT Pre-market 690.10 +13.08 (1.93%)
Apr. 12, 4:10 a.m. EDT Pre-market 690.10 +13.08 (1.93%)
That is actually a blatant show of manipulation. If we break 700 today, it's quite obvious we were pushed down last week and MM's spent the week rebalancing their options for this weeks break above 700.
In my opinion the interior of that Mercedes EQS is on the opposite end of the scale from classy.
Some people have both good chauffeurs and excellent cars:
This is Britains Prince Charles and his chauffeur photographed by a paparazzi recently.
Some people have both good chauffeurs and excellent cars:
This is Britains Prince Charles and his chauffeur photographed by a paparazzi recently.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
